You know,

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 11:26

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 09:29

Better not duel him if you care about your elo

coz Stryko is #-1.

Stryko isn't #1

Yes, he's #-1

fun fact:

in AW, there is no real #1, and anyone who thinks differently doesn't know the game well enough

the concept of 'best player' is a myth people!

but my original statement still stands c:

Stryko isn't #1

Hey I'm just going to repeat the same thing again because saying it twice will somehow prove my point!

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 13:03

Hey I'm just going to repeat the same thing again because saying it twice will somehow prove my point!

hes in epic clan, what you expect. But he's still right, stryko suka blyat.

Nero #1!

Napisano przez Azula., 19.09.2016 at 11:55

Napisano przez Ghostface, 18.09.2016 at 14:30

Am i considered old fag elitist or new elite ? D

just fagg, nothing more xaxaxa

XAXAXA

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 11:26

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 09:29

Better not duel him if you care about your elo

coz Stryko is #-1.

Stryko isn't #1

Yes, he's #-1

fun fact:

in AW, there is no real #1, and anyone who thinks differently doesn't know the game well enough

the concept of 'best player' is a myth people!

but my original statement still stands c:

Stryko isn't #1

Zenith cant into reading....

Napisano przez 1GodofWar1, 20.09.2016 at 02:54

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 11:26

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 09:29

Better not duel him if you care about your elo

coz Stryko is #-1.

Stryko isn't #1

Yes, he's #-1

fun fact:

in AW, there is no real #1, and anyone who thinks differently doesn't know the game well enough

the concept of 'best player' is a myth people!

but my original statement still stands c:

Stryko isn't #1

Zenith cant into reading....

ENIGMA

I'm not an elite and I know it so no worries here, yay

Napisano przez Zephyrusu, 20.09.2016 at 04:29

I'm not an elite and I know it so no worries here, yay

You're garbage and I'm gonna win.

Napisano przez Guest, 20.09.2016 at 05:29

Napisano przez Zephyrusu, 20.09.2016 at 04:29

I'm not an elite and I know it so no worries here, yay

You're garbage and I'm gonna win.

wow you suck

Haha:gunner:

Napisano przez 1GodofWar1, 20.09.2016 at 02:54

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 11:26

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 09:29

Better not duel him if you care about your elo

coz Stryko is #-1.

Stryko isn't #1

Yes, he's #-1

fun fact:

in AW, there is no real #1, and anyone who thinks differently doesn't know the game well enough

the concept of 'best player' is a myth people!

but my original statement still stands c:

Stryko isn't #1

Zenith cant into reading....

GOW is #1.
Can i read now?

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

Napisano przez Zenith, 21.09.2016 at 09:58

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

stryko is #1 of a kind

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

in AW, there is no real #1

Mauzer #1 hands down

Napisano przez clovis1122, 21.09.2016 at 11:55

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

in AW, there is no real #1

Mauzer #1 hands down

#1 by sp.

there's also #1 by elo, #1 by rep, #1 by blahblah, but there is no overall #1

again, anyone who thinks there is is fooling themselves

Napisano przez Zenith, 21.09.2016 at 09:58

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

HE'S NUMBER NEGATIVE ONE I WAS MAKING A JOKE AASADSDHHSHDFSDSDGGSDJSGJFGJSDFG

Napisano przez The Tactician, 21.09.2016 at 12:05

Napisano przez clovis1122, 21.09.2016 at 11:55

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

in AW, there is no real #1

Mauzer #1 hands down

#1 by sp.

there's also #1 by elo, #1 by rep, #1 by blahblah, but there is no overall #1

again, anyone who thinks there is is fooling themselves

Correction: There's an official overall system to determine how good you are (SP system) which is not accurate enough due to several flaws.

But indeed reading between lines you are right, no flawless system exist.

Napisano przez The Tactician, 21.09.2016 at 12:07

Napisano przez Zenith, 21.09.2016 at 09:58

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

HE'S NUMBER NEGATIVE ONE I WAS MAKING A JOKE AASADSDHHSHDFSDSDGGSDJSGJFGJSDFG

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

MY eyes are horrible LOL i cant believe i didnt realize that LOLOLOL

PHOTOSHOP

I told him he was #-1 (NUMBER NEGATIVE ONE)

if only i was determined enough to go through the irc logs...

Napisano przez The Tactician, 22.09.2016 at 00:32

PHOTOSHOP

I told him he was #-1 (NUMBER NEGATIVE ONE)

if only i was determined enough to go through the irc logs...

if only...

Napisano przez Zenith, 21.09.2016 at 09:58

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

Man, can't you see the negative sign just in front of the 1????

Napisano przez RaulPB, 22.09.2016 at 05:23

Man, can't you see the negative sign just in front of the 1????

Considering #1 is better than #2, doesn't that mean #-1 is better than #1?

Napisano przez Zephyrusu, 22.09.2016 at 08:14

Napisano przez RaulPB, 22.09.2016 at 05:23

Man, can't you see the negative sign just in front of the 1????

Considering #1 is better than #2, doesn't that mean #-1 is better than #1?

OHHHHHH SNAPPPPPPPPP

Also i'll just leave this here for any newfags saying im not #1!

Napisano przez 1GodofWar1, 21.09.2016 at 11:28

Napisano przez Zenith, 21.09.2016 at 09:58

Napisano przez RaulPB, 21.09.2016 at 09:23

Napisano przez Zenith, 19.09.2016 at 12:00

Napisano przez The Tactician, 19.09.2016 at 11:44

Yes, he's "#" "-" "1"

Stryko isn't #1

There you go, a little help

I don't need help. Stryko isn't #1. There cannot be a #1 in atWar.

stryko is #1 of a kind

your wife is HOT

Stryko strong

stryko #-1

but stryko not #1

because stryko suk

Napisano przez The Tactician, 22.09.2016 at 09:08

Stryko strong

stryko #-1

but stryko not #1

because stryko suk

Don't make me demote you in IRC