Biggwall problems.

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 14:50

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 14:48

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 14:40

Laochra and I are doing you a favor for taking the time to respond to your arguments with logic, yet you make endless ad-hominem attacks and expect us to somehow change our opinions in the matter, because "waffel can't ever be wrong"

Oh god... you are getting all sentimental now. I think im gonna start crying. Its funny that you and clovis have sooo in common.
Argueing with clovis is like saying
'' Hey my name is Waffel, how are you?''
Clovis: Why are you calling me slut?, ignored bye.

Its useless and it leads nowhere. I hope you can live with your self, and I sincerely hope your life gets great for you. From now on you'll on my ignore.
Have a great life tunder.

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.09.2014 at 10:08

I see more people doing this and its not cool.... you guys seriously wf now to get your rushy expansion succeed...
Even if you aint attacking the city which you just wf'ed, it doesn't make it up that you actually wf'ed it with the intentsions...
Stop this and find another way to rush belarus but stay out of this odessa wf.

Before people bitch that I cry because of the ''lose''
This isn't me playing.

You change your opinion too easy, it seems like you always find a way to bitch about something
you are a big hypocrite waffell, and you also falsely accuse people of being stuff that you are

If you can read, I was implying to the Odessa WF, as I also reffered earlier this thread, idk if you are trying to let me look bad with this double layers wall, but that wasn't what I was reffering all about, you know it, any other knows it, bcs I simply said >''stay out of this odessa wf'' and I know it.

Like I said, you are trying to win an arguement with things from other threads with other subjects, if you still keep on telling you arent going off-topic, there must be really something wrong with you ...

7 post thread, and yet u didnt read any of them...
Start reading all of it before you start bitching about it tunder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=15576&board_page=3

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 14:55

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

You know im tired of this shit.

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.
And if people WF the bigg wall turn 1, without attacking their capital, and just wf it turn 2 too they get mad. Lmao.

Only because some people feel like playing this game, its not a reason to say :''If they do it, you do it too'' because thats just beyond stupid.. if people want to play this way, go ahead but dont expect people to like it and accept it. Wall is to prevent getting capped FOR THAT TURN. if you wall like this to prevent it from 2 turns walled, dont cry if people wf just to make it 1 turn.

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.09.2014 at 10:08

I see more people doing this and its not cool.... you guys seriously wf now to get your rushy expansion succeed...
Even if you aint attacking the city which you just wf'ed, it doesn't make it up that you actually wf'ed it with the intentsions...
Stop this and find another way to rush belarus but stay out of this odessa wf.

Before people bitch that I cry because of the ''lose''
This isn't me playing.

Love how wfs are legal/illegal depending if it suits you or not

Read the comment above you.
You are tryharding to get me so much, but it fails everytime... its funny, and sad at the same time. I feel sorry for you.

Sorry waffel, but you are a fool

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.

Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

You have failed to provide a proper response to this statement, before you comment something stupid, remember that we already agreed that: "double-layer walls" and "big-wall" have the same effects and both are affected by a irrational wf turn 1.

All my other posts point how your hypocrisy and ignorance.

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 15:10

Sorry waffel, but you are a fool

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.

Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

You have failed to provide a proper response to this statement, before you comment something stupid, remember that we already agreed that: "double-layer walls" and "big-wall" have the same effects and both are affected by a irrational wf turn 1.

All my other posts point how your hypocrisy and ignorance.

Oh now you start this again? Are you hopping from subject to subject when its getting to hard for you to give actuall reasonable arguements?

Your arguement about the SS you sent failed, now you start this again?

How am I hypocrisy and ignorance? I have provided you my OPINION, and why I think this bigwall is wrong, so did goblin, we didn't insult at all, but all we got was getting insulted by you, and khal. How is this nice and reasoning? I have told you, the way you compared the wall turn 1 capital (which isnt the subject) with the biggwall is a big difference, when I said this, you said '' gg you got rekked'' or something like that and started hopping on another subject to trying to get me.

Tunder whats the point of this all?
Like seriously.. what are you trying to do? If you disagree with it, simply say it, and why. Dont go all offensive and take other subjects from other threads to ''support'' your arguement.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 15:29

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 15:10

Sorry waffel, but you are a fool

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.

Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

You have failed to provide a proper response to this statement, before you comment something stupid, remember that we already agreed that: "double-layer walls" and "big-wall" have the same effects and both are affected by a irrational wf turn 1.

All my other posts point how your hypocrisy and ignorance.

Oh now you start this again? Are you hopping from subject to subject when its getting to hard for you to give actuall reasonable arguements?

Your arguement about the SS you sent failed, now you start this again?

How am I hypocrisy and ignorance? I have provided you my OPINION, and why I think this bigwall is wrong, so did goblin, we didn't insult at all, but all we got was getting insulted by you, and khal. How is this nice and reasoning? I have told you, the way you compared the wall turn 1 capital (which isnt the subject) with the biggwall is a big difference, when I said this, you said '' gg you got rekked'' or something like that and started hopping on another subject to trying to get me.

Tunder whats the point of this all?
Like seriously.. what are you trying to do? If you disagree with it, simply say it, and why. Dont go all offensive and take other subjects from other threads to ''support'' your arguement.

Ignoring my points is a example of ignorance.
Making false accusations about me, while you are guilty of most of them is hypocresy
Saying you and goblin didn't insulted at all is plain lying.

Comparing capital walls with big-walls is a valid sense of logic and is related to the argument:

Waffel claims X is not good because X does A
Waffel claims Y is good because Y is not X
Y does A, therefore waffel is incorrect.

Waffel, you are the one that started all the ad-hominem attacks and goblin is guilty too, all of your post were charged with hate, not a single time i made an ad-hominem towards you. I can quote you if you want evidence.

The point is that you are wrong, and wfing turn 1 is for cunts

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 16:15

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 15:29

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 15:10

Sorry waffel, but you are a fool

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.

Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

You have failed to provide a proper response to this statement, before you comment something stupid, remember that we already agreed that: "double-layer walls" and "big-wall" have the same effects and both are affected by a irrational wf turn 1.

All my other posts point how your hypocrisy and ignorance.

Oh now you start this again? Are you hopping from subject to subject when its getting to hard for you to give actuall reasonable arguements?

Your arguement about the SS you sent failed, now you start this again?

How am I hypocrisy and ignorance? I have provided you my OPINION, and why I think this bigwall is wrong, so did goblin, we didn't insult at all, but all we got was getting insulted by you, and khal. How is this nice and reasoning? I have told you, the way you compared the wall turn 1 capital (which isnt the subject) with the biggwall is a big difference, when I said this, you said '' gg you got rekked'' or something like that and started hopping on another subject to trying to get me.

Tunder whats the point of this all?
Like seriously.. what are you trying to do? If you disagree with it, simply say it, and why. Dont go all offensive and take other subjects from other threads to ''support'' your arguement.

Ignoring my points is a example of ignorance.
Making false accusations about me, while you are guilty of most of them is hypocresy
Saying you and goblin didn't insulted at all is plain lying.

Comparing capital walls with big-walls is a valid sense of logic and is related to the argument:

Waffel claims X is not good because X does A
Waffel claims Y is good because Y is not X
Y does A, therefore waffel is incorrect.

Waffel, you are the one that started all the ad-hominem attacks and goblin is guilty too, all of your post were charged with hate, not a single time i made an ad-hominem towards you. I can quote you if you want evidence.

The point is that you are wrong, and wfing turn 1 is for cunts

1. I didn't ignore any of your points.
2. What falsce accusations? and how am I guilty for it? Explain please.
3. Where did I actually insult that wasn't reffered to this thread subject?
4. How are Walls turn 1 (other subject , said this for 100000 times.) and Biggwalls turn 1 and 2, the same? Please tell me.
5. None of my posts were charged with hate, I even put in the main post, that I didn't wanted to lead this out to a flamingwar, but after you and clovis joined this thread and just went complete autism, I think that sentence become useless.
6. Quote pls, bcs all the quotes i've seen so far, had lead nowhere. So I really wonder if these 'evidence quotes'' will lead somewhere.

The funny thing is, you are merging into an arguement you have no clue about at all, you talk about rewalling and crap, which in the first 3/4/5 pages nothing was mentioned about rewall, so how could you seriously tell me, you didn't change the subject?
I agree with wfing turn 1 is for cunts, So I am a cunt big deal? Like I care about what you think about me (also said this 10000times).

Also saying that the point is that I am wrong, isnt hypocritcal at all right? because whatever you say must be the truth?
Silly.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

3. Where did I actually insult that wasn't reffered to this thread subject?

Look at your responses, all of them charged with ad-hominems

Napisano przez Waffel, 15.10.2014 at 04:05

Idk if you have reading problems or whatever? But quoting you way in here (like you do in every drama thread) and just trying to pass the subject is not what I or the rest of the people in this arguement are waiting for.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You and clovis are tyring to troll or turn this whole topic to another subject, so you both better nock it. Thanks.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You didn't destroy anything? you came here talking about something complete different and I told you that, if thats what you call ''destroyed'' than I wish you all the luck further in life.

Napisano przez Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 10:36

Tunder, stop trying troll a thread, multiple people have told you this in those years, so did mods. Just nock it.

You accused me of being dumb, a drama queen, and a troll. All of those accusations are ad-hominems, AKA personal attacks. I haven't commited a single Ad-homniem until you posted a big long bitching post that completly ignored all the points that were issued by everybody in this topic.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

1. I didn't ignore any of your points.

That is a lie, you never adressed my point in any of your post, all you did was to use ad-homniem and went "Fuck Logic"
This was your justification:

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

^i already proved that your justification is invalid since capital walls can't be prevent either

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.
Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

So yes, you ignored my point.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

2. What falsce accusations? and how am I guilty for it? Explain please.

You accused me of being a troll, drama queen, and being dumb.
Most players would agree that the former description suits you well.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

4. How are Walls turn 1 (other subject , said this for 100000 times.) and Biggwalls turn 1 and 2, the same? Please tell me.

Capital Walls turn 1 can't be prevented, just like bigwalls and double-layer walls.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

5. None of my posts were charged with hate, I even put in the main post, that I didn't wanted to lead this out to a flamingwar, but after you and clovis joined this thread and just went complete autism, I think that sentence become useless.

Your first post itself, was a big rant charged with hate, its even considered as bitching/crying. Anyone would agree. Look at point 3, your post are charged with ad-hominems too.
clovis =/= me

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

6. Quote pls, bcs all the quotes i've seen so far, had lead nowhere. So I really wonder if these 'evidence quotes'' will lead somewhere.

Enjoy.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

The funny thing is, you are merging into an arguement you have no clue about at all, you talk about rewalling and crap, which in the first 3/4/5 pages nothing was mentioned about rewall, so

Oh, really? i am the one without clue?

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 14:59

3. there should be no rewalling turn 2

Rewalling, in its "infamous" state i limit only too turn 2 and definite it as:
• preventing an opponent to have a chance at breaking walls that would leave his capital city open*
* preventing does not include of course turn blocking your opponents wall fuck units in order to prevent them in this task

Since rewalling is preventable in every way after turn 2, by wall fuck units and that includes the big walls aswell:
• rewalling should be permited after turn 2

Turn 2 rewalling can unbalance the game and gain undeserved advantage to some countries which is far greater then the initial "capital" invested so to speak (does few extra units).

Conclusion:
• a move that cant be prevented, by your own moves and skills ...cant be a legal move. ...this is a similarity between 1st turn wf and big wall rewall.

You cant contradict this Laochra.

Napisano przez W4R_MaChINE, 13.10.2014 at 15:07

Lao is right, big walling your cap, and making a 2nd wall afterwards is legal. Do I think it's a fair tactic? Eh. The point is, if there is a legal way to stop someone from doing it, then why shouldn't we be allowed to do it?

Rewalling gives an unfair advantage. Classify rewall as a bug.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 15:54

Btw. "classify rewall as a bug" comment ...

Napisano przez Goblin, 14.10.2014 at 10:01

Preventable:
• Rewalling, wallglitching
• Serbian rewalling

Not preventable:
• Big wall rewalling on turn 2
• First turn wall fucks of any walls in your opponents teritory
• Entering someones teritory on turn 1

Lol man, the entire topic was about big-wall combined with rewalling. YOU are the one that went off-topic

Waffel got #rekt

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 17:24

Tunder VS Madness

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

3. Where did I actually insult that wasn't reffered to this thread subject?

Look at your responses, all of them charged with ad-hominems

Napisano przez Waffel, 15.10.2014 at 04:05

Idk if you have reading problems or whatever? But quoting you way in here (like you do in every drama thread) and just trying to pass the subject is not what I or the rest of the people in this arguement are waiting for.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You and clovis are tyring to troll or turn this whole topic to another subject, so you both better nock it. Thanks.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You didn't destroy anything? you came here talking about something complete different and I told you that, if thats what you call ''destroyed'' than I wish you all the luck further in life.

Napisano przez Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 10:36

Tunder, stop trying troll a thread, multiple people have told you this in those years, so did mods. Just nock it.

You accused me of being dumb, a drama queen, and a troll. All of those accusations are ad-hominems, AKA personal attacks. I haven't commited a single Ad-homniem until you posted a big long bitching post that completly ignored all the points that were issued by everybody in this topic.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

1. I didn't ignore any of your points.

That is a lie, you never adressed my point in any of your post, all you did was to use ad-homniem and went "Fuck Logic"
This was your justification:

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

^i already proved that your justification is invalid since capital walls can't be prevent either

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.
Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

So yes, you ignored my point.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

2. What falsce accusations? and how am I guilty for it? Explain please.

You accused me of being a troll, drama queen, and being dumb.
Most players would agree that the former description suits you well.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

4. How are Walls turn 1 (other subject , said this for 100000 times.) and Biggwalls turn 1 and 2, the same? Please tell me.

Capital Walls turn 1 can't be prevented, just like bigwalls and double-layer walls.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

5. None of my posts were charged with hate, I even put in the main post, that I didn't wanted to lead this out to a flamingwar, but after you and clovis joined this thread and just went complete autism, I think that sentence become useless.

Your first post itself, was a big rant charged with hate, its even considered as bitching/crying. Anyone would agree. Look at point 3, your post are charged with ad-hominems too.
clovis =/= me

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

6. Quote pls, bcs all the quotes i've seen so far, had lead nowhere. So I really wonder if these 'evidence quotes'' will lead somewhere.

Enjoy.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

The funny thing is, you are merging into an arguement you have no clue about at all, you talk about rewalling and crap, which in the first 3/4/5 pages nothing was mentioned about rewall, so

Oh, really? i am the one without clue?

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 14:59

3. there should be no rewalling turn 2

Rewalling, in its "infamous" state i limit only too turn 2 and definite it as:
• preventing an opponent to have a chance at breaking walls that would leave his capital city open*
* preventing does not include of course turn blocking your opponents wall fuck units in order to prevent them in this task

Since rewalling is preventable in every way after turn 2, by wall fuck units and that includes the big walls aswell:
• rewalling should be permited after turn 2

Turn 2 rewalling can unbalance the game and gain undeserved advantage to some countries which is far greater then the initial "capital" invested so to speak (does few extra units).

Conclusion:
• a move that cant be prevented, by your own moves and skills ...cant be a legal move. ...this is a similarity between 1st turn wf and big wall rewall.

You cant contradict this Laochra.

Napisano przez W4R_MaChINE, 13.10.2014 at 15:07

Lao is right, big walling your cap, and making a 2nd wall afterwards is legal. Do I think it's a fair tactic? Eh. The point is, if there is a legal way to stop someone from doing it, then why shouldn't we be allowed to do it?

Rewalling gives an unfair advantage. Classify rewall as a bug.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 15:54

Btw. "classify rewall as a bug" comment ...

Napisano przez Goblin, 14.10.2014 at 10:01

Preventable:
• Rewalling, wallglitching
• Serbian rewalling

Not preventable:
• Big wall rewalling on turn 2
• First turn wall fucks of any walls in your opponents teritory
• Entering someones teritory on turn 1

Lol man, the entire topic was about big-wall combined with rewalling. YOU are the one that went off-topic

Omygod....

1. I didn;t Ad-hominem any of your crap, Your comments are completely ridicilous and have nothing to do what kind of thoughts I have about you. You started about rewalling, you accused goblin of starting about rewall first, now you are saying it is me?
2. And ehm bro, I seriously think you have reading issues, if thats ''an accusation'' in your eyes, you need to get them checked.
I didn't call you anything of them besides a troll, about the dramaqueen and being dumb, is all about how you take up stuff.
3. I have told you plenty of times why WF is legit and why I think this biggrewall shouldn't be... -.- seriously stop repeating things?
Every 3v3 players knows why WF isn't legit in turn 1. Maybe you should interest a little bit more in that before you start talking crap.
4. Do you know the difference between rules and ''strategy''?
- The no wf turn 1 is a rule
-The biggwall is what you guys '' a strategy move''
5. I dont care what people think about me? You obviously do? Pls dont merge that with this thread either, this thread has already TO much off-topic comments from yourside.
Also point 3? Dont you mean point 5? Like I said, you need to learn how to read.
6. My main post wasn't filled with hate, the hate comments came later on when you guys started to ignore the main issue and just started rambling about bullshit...
also stop this ad-hominem crap, do you even fking know the meaning off ad-hominem? you use it to much out of context ...
7.

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

No.. omygod... you dont even know the difference between re-walling and this biggwal? No wonder why you are talking this bullcrap.
Rewalling is moving your units ( you dont need to move them tho, but is easier, so no fail re-wall) and replacing with new units so the old units will die(get destroyed) and the new units will form an new wall.

This biggwall is just a big circle wall that prevents people to open the triangle wall that will be placed on turn 2, or is already placed on turn 1.
The problem I am talking about this whole thread and somehow after repeating this 10000million times you still dont get it. is that YOU SIMPLY CANT OPEN THE WALL ON TURN 2.
WITH REWALL YOU CAN OPEN IT ON TURN 2 BUT IF YOU DONT WF IT ITS WALLED IN TURN 3 AGAIN.. (which is your own fault)

8. Those quotes from goblin and W4r were AFTER you started putting CRAP about rewall here. I didn't go OFF topic, I made this thread, I know what I am talking about, you are the one who cant think straight here.. Seriously stop wasting your time and mine. And just end it. Because discussing with you is pointless just like Goblin said. And I will do the same as Goblin did, and just simply ignore your comments from now on since there is no way to actually get through you..

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Waffel, 21.10.2014 at 15:37

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 17:24

Tunder VS Madness

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

3. Where did I actually insult that wasn't reffered to this thread subject?

Look at your responses, all of them charged with ad-hominems

Napisano przez Waffel, 15.10.2014 at 04:05

Idk if you have reading problems or whatever? But quoting you way in here (like you do in every drama thread) and just trying to pass the subject is not what I or the rest of the people in this arguement are waiting for.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You and clovis are tyring to troll or turn this whole topic to another subject, so you both better nock it. Thanks.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You didn't destroy anything? you came here talking about something complete different and I told you that, if thats what you call ''destroyed'' than I wish you all the luck further in life.

Napisano przez Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 10:36

Tunder, stop trying troll a thread, multiple people have told you this in those years, so did mods. Just nock it.

You accused me of being dumb, a drama queen, and a troll. All of those accusations are ad-hominems, AKA personal attacks. I haven't commited a single Ad-homniem until you posted a big long bitching post that completly ignored all the points that were issued by everybody in this topic.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

1. I didn't ignore any of your points.

That is a lie, you never adressed my point in any of your post, all you did was to use ad-homniem and went "Fuck Logic"
This was your justification:

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

^i already proved that your justification is invalid since capital walls can't be prevent either

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.
Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

So yes, you ignored my point.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

2. What falsce accusations? and how am I guilty for it? Explain please.

You accused me of being a troll, drama queen, and being dumb.
Most players would agree that the former description suits you well.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

4. How are Walls turn 1 (other subject , said this for 100000 times.) and Biggwalls turn 1 and 2, the same? Please tell me.

Capital Walls turn 1 can't be prevented, just like bigwalls and double-layer walls.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

5. None of my posts were charged with hate, I even put in the main post, that I didn't wanted to lead this out to a flamingwar, but after you and clovis joined this thread and just went complete autism, I think that sentence become useless.

Your first post itself, was a big rant charged with hate, its even considered as bitching/crying. Anyone would agree. Look at point 3, your post are charged with ad-hominems too.
clovis =/= me

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

6. Quote pls, bcs all the quotes i've seen so far, had lead nowhere. So I really wonder if these 'evidence quotes'' will lead somewhere.

Enjoy.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

The funny thing is, you are merging into an arguement you have no clue about at all, you talk about rewalling and crap, which in the first 3/4/5 pages nothing was mentioned about rewall, so

Oh, really? i am the one without clue?

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 14:59

3. there should be no rewalling turn 2

Rewalling, in its "infamous" state i limit only too turn 2 and definite it as:
• preventing an opponent to have a chance at breaking walls that would leave his capital city open*
* preventing does not include of course turn blocking your opponents wall fuck units in order to prevent them in this task

Since rewalling is preventable in every way after turn 2, by wall fuck units and that includes the big walls aswell:
• rewalling should be permited after turn 2

Turn 2 rewalling can unbalance the game and gain undeserved advantage to some countries which is far greater then the initial "capital" invested so to speak (does few extra units).

Conclusion:
• a move that cant be prevented, by your own moves and skills ...cant be a legal move. ...this is a similarity between 1st turn wf and big wall rewall.

You cant contradict this Laochra.

Napisano przez W4R_MaChINE, 13.10.2014 at 15:07

Lao is right, big walling your cap, and making a 2nd wall afterwards is legal. Do I think it's a fair tactic? Eh. The point is, if there is a legal way to stop someone from doing it, then why shouldn't we be allowed to do it?

Rewalling gives an unfair advantage. Classify rewall as a bug.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 15:54

Btw. "classify rewall as a bug" comment ...

Napisano przez Goblin, 14.10.2014 at 10:01

Preventable:
• Rewalling, wallglitching
• Serbian rewalling

Not preventable:
• Big wall rewalling on turn 2
• First turn wall fucks of any walls in your opponents teritory
• Entering someones teritory on turn 1

Lol man, the entire topic was about big-wall combined with rewalling. YOU are the one that went off-topic

Omygod....

1. I didn;t Ad-hominem any of your crap, Your comments are completely ridicilous and have nothing to do what kind of thoughts I have about you. You started about rewalling, you accused goblin of starting about rewall first, now you are saying it is me?
2. And ehm bro, I seriously think you have reading issues, if thats ''an accusation'' in your eyes, you need to get them checked.
I didn't call you anything of them besides a troll, about the dramaqueen and being dumb, is all about how you take up stuff.
3. I have told you plenty of times why WF is legit and why I think this biggrewall shouldn't be... -.- seriously stop repeating things?
Every 3v3 players knows why WF isn't legit in turn 1. Maybe you should interest a little bit more in that before you start talking crap.
4. Do you know the difference between rules and ''strategy''?
- The no wf turn 1 is a rule
-The biggwall is what you guys '' a strategy move''
5. I dont care what people think about me? You obviously do? Pls dont merge that with this thread either, this thread has already TO much off-topic comments from yourside.
Also point 3? Dont you mean point 5? Like I said, you need to learn how to read.
6. My main post wasn't filled with hate, the hate comments came later on when you guys started to ignore the main issue and just started rambling about bullshit...
also stop this ad-hominem crap, do you even fking know the meaning off ad-hominem? you use it to much out of context ...
7.

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

No.. omygod... you dont even know the difference between re-walling and this biggwal? No wonder why you are talking this bullcrap.
Rewalling is moving your units ( you dont need to move them tho, but is easier, so no fail re-wall) and replacing with new units so the old units will die(get destroyed) and the new units will form an new wall.

This biggwall is just a big circle wall that prevents people to open the triangle wall that will be placed on turn 2, or is already placed on turn 1.
The problem I am talking about this whole thread and somehow after repeating this 10000million times you still dont get it. is that YOU SIMPLY CANT OPEN THE WALL ON TURN 2.
WITH REWALL YOU CAN OPEN IT ON TURN 2 BUT IF YOU DONT WF IT ITS WALLED IN TURN 3 AGAIN.. (which is your own fault)

8. Those quotes from goblin and W4r were AFTER you started putting CRAP about rewall here. I didn't go OFF topic, I made this thread, I know what I am talking about, you are the one who cant think straight here.. Seriously stop wasting your time and mine. And just end it. Because discussing with you is pointless just like Goblin said. And I will do the same as Goblin did, and just simply ignore your comments from now on since there is no way to actually get through you..

1.- lies
2.- lies
3.- repeating the same invalid argument over and over again won't make it valid
4.- irrelevant
5.- check point 3, i quoted all your personal attacks, again you show A disability to understand other human responses.
6.-lies
7.- "re" comes from the word redo, re-walling = redoing a wall, since a big-wall is considered a cap wall, making a new wall in the capital would fall under the category of re-walling.
8.- lies, those quotes are from the first 4 pages before i even joined the argument.

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Tundy, 22.10.2014 at 10:23

Napisano przez Waffel, 21.10.2014 at 15:37

Napisano przez Tundy, 20.10.2014 at 17:24

Tunder VS Madness

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

3. Where did I actually insult that wasn't reffered to this thread subject?

Look at your responses, all of them charged with ad-hominems

Napisano przez Waffel, 15.10.2014 at 04:05

Idk if you have reading problems or whatever? But quoting you way in here (like you do in every drama thread) and just trying to pass the subject is not what I or the rest of the people in this arguement are waiting for.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You and clovis are tyring to troll or turn this whole topic to another subject, so you both better nock it. Thanks.

Napisano przez Waffel, 16.10.2014 at 08:36

You didn't destroy anything? you came here talking about something complete different and I told you that, if thats what you call ''destroyed'' than I wish you all the luck further in life.

Napisano przez Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 10:36

Tunder, stop trying troll a thread, multiple people have told you this in those years, so did mods. Just nock it.

You accused me of being dumb, a drama queen, and a troll. All of those accusations are ad-hominems, AKA personal attacks. I haven't commited a single Ad-homniem until you posted a big long bitching post that completly ignored all the points that were issued by everybody in this topic.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

1. I didn't ignore any of your points.

That is a lie, you never adressed my point in any of your post, all you did was to use ad-homniem and went "Fuck Logic"
This was your justification:

Napisano przez Waffel, 14.10.2014 at 15:46

Double capital wall has no counter, The only counter for it is to WF turn 1. And since wfing on turn 1 is not legit, this wall shouldn't be legit either since the counter is not legit.

^i already proved that your justification is invalid since capital walls can't be prevent either

Napisano przez Tundy, 14.10.2014 at 17:08

With that logic, Making a wall in your capital (turn 1) is not legit, since the only way to prevent it is by wfing (turn 1) and since wfing (turn 1) is not legit then: walling capital turn 1 shouldn't be legit either, since the counter is not legit.
Ok waffle, Making walls turn 1 is now illgeal, that skill.

So yes, you ignored my point.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

2. What falsce accusations? and how am I guilty for it? Explain please.

You accused me of being a troll, drama queen, and being dumb.
Most players would agree that the former description suits you well.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

4. How are Walls turn 1 (other subject , said this for 100000 times.) and Biggwalls turn 1 and 2, the same? Please tell me.

Capital Walls turn 1 can't be prevented, just like bigwalls and double-layer walls.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

5. None of my posts were charged with hate, I even put in the main post, that I didn't wanted to lead this out to a flamingwar, but after you and clovis joined this thread and just went complete autism, I think that sentence become useless.

Your first post itself, was a big rant charged with hate, its even considered as bitching/crying. Anyone would agree. Look at point 3, your post are charged with ad-hominems too.
clovis =/= me

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

6. Quote pls, bcs all the quotes i've seen so far, had lead nowhere. So I really wonder if these 'evidence quotes'' will lead somewhere.

Enjoy.

Napisano przez Waffel, 20.10.2014 at 16:22

The funny thing is, you are merging into an arguement you have no clue about at all, you talk about rewalling and crap, which in the first 3/4/5 pages nothing was mentioned about rewall, so

Oh, really? i am the one without clue?

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 14:59

3. there should be no rewalling turn 2

Rewalling, in its "infamous" state i limit only too turn 2 and definite it as:
• preventing an opponent to have a chance at breaking walls that would leave his capital city open*
* preventing does not include of course turn blocking your opponents wall fuck units in order to prevent them in this task

Since rewalling is preventable in every way after turn 2, by wall fuck units and that includes the big walls aswell:
• rewalling should be permited after turn 2

Turn 2 rewalling can unbalance the game and gain undeserved advantage to some countries which is far greater then the initial "capital" invested so to speak (does few extra units).

Conclusion:
• a move that cant be prevented, by your own moves and skills ...cant be a legal move. ...this is a similarity between 1st turn wf and big wall rewall.

You cant contradict this Laochra.

Napisano przez W4R_MaChINE, 13.10.2014 at 15:07

Lao is right, big walling your cap, and making a 2nd wall afterwards is legal. Do I think it's a fair tactic? Eh. The point is, if there is a legal way to stop someone from doing it, then why shouldn't we be allowed to do it?

Rewalling gives an unfair advantage. Classify rewall as a bug.

Napisano przez Goblin, 13.10.2014 at 15:54

Btw. "classify rewall as a bug" comment ...

Napisano przez Goblin, 14.10.2014 at 10:01

Preventable:
• Rewalling, wallglitching
• Serbian rewalling

Not preventable:
• Big wall rewalling on turn 2
• First turn wall fucks of any walls in your opponents teritory
• Entering someones teritory on turn 1

Lol man, the entire topic was about big-wall combined with rewalling. YOU are the one that went off-topic

Omygod....

1. I didn;t Ad-hominem any of your crap, Your comments are completely ridicilous and have nothing to do what kind of thoughts I have about you. You started about rewalling, you accused goblin of starting about rewall first, now you are saying it is me?
2. And ehm bro, I seriously think you have reading issues, if thats ''an accusation'' in your eyes, you need to get them checked.
I didn't call you anything of them besides a troll, about the dramaqueen and being dumb, is all about how you take up stuff.
3. I have told you plenty of times why WF is legit and why I think this biggrewall shouldn't be... -.- seriously stop repeating things?
Every 3v3 players knows why WF isn't legit in turn 1. Maybe you should interest a little bit more in that before you start talking crap.
4. Do you know the difference between rules and ''strategy''?
- The no wf turn 1 is a rule
-The biggwall is what you guys '' a strategy move''
5. I dont care what people think about me? You obviously do? Pls dont merge that with this thread either, this thread has already TO much off-topic comments from yourside.
Also point 3? Dont you mean point 5? Like I said, you need to learn how to read.
6. My main post wasn't filled with hate, the hate comments came later on when you guys started to ignore the main issue and just started rambling about bullshit...
also stop this ad-hominem crap, do you even fking know the meaning off ad-hominem? you use it to much out of context ...
7.

Napisano przez Waffel, 13.10.2014 at 14:14

People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.

That, its the fucking description of re-walling.

No.. omygod... you dont even know the difference between re-walling and this biggwal? No wonder why you are talking this bullcrap.
Rewalling is moving your units ( you dont need to move them tho, but is easier, so no fail re-wall) and replacing with new units so the old units will die(get destroyed) and the new units will form an new wall.

This biggwall is just a big circle wall that prevents people to open the triangle wall that will be placed on turn 2, or is already placed on turn 1.
The problem I am talking about this whole thread and somehow after repeating this 10000million times you still dont get it. is that YOU SIMPLY CANT OPEN THE WALL ON TURN 2.
WITH REWALL YOU CAN OPEN IT ON TURN 2 BUT IF YOU DONT WF IT ITS WALLED IN TURN 3 AGAIN.. (which is your own fault)

8. Those quotes from goblin and W4r were AFTER you started putting CRAP about rewall here. I didn't go OFF topic, I made this thread, I know what I am talking about, you are the one who cant think straight here.. Seriously stop wasting your time and mine. And just end it. Because discussing with you is pointless just like Goblin said. And I will do the same as Goblin did, and just simply ignore your comments from now on since there is no way to actually get through you..

1.- lies
2.- lies
3.- repeating the same invalid argument over and over again won't make it valid
4.- irrelevant
5.- check point 3, i quoted all your personal attacks, again you show A disability to understand other human responses.
6.-lies
7.- "re" comes from the word redo, re-walling = redoing a wall, since a big-wall is considered a cap wall, making a new wall in the capital would fall under the category of re-walling.
8.- lies, those quotes are from the first 4 pages before i even joined the argument.

Maybe tell why they are lies? Because this is the problem, you say things without actually discribing why they are lies or what is wrong.
I could say all you do is telling lies and my point is right, but I am not doing that. I tell you why I think that, and how. I dont see any effort from your side, therefore I dont really think you are being serious at all but just trolling.

Holy God these quote walls stop everyone.

Btw Waffel link me your counter-argument vs Tunder's, the one that invloves 1st turn WFing (not saying any of you do it)

Napisano przez Permamuted, 24.10.2014 at 05:26

You and waffel have argued that your issue with these walls is the unfairness of not having to defend your cap until turn 4. Do you deny this being the case?

So what difference is there between a double wall turn 1, or a big circle wall where the other player walls within it turn 2? Its achieves the same effect, yet you feel this is acceptable. Given your previous arguments against rewalling and big wall rewalls why is this acceptable? What reasoning are you applying?

Desu explained it from a technical standpoint, but the reasoning you applied for bigwall rewalling being unfair covers doublewalling too. And you stated your intention to first turn wf users of the latter.

nobody has twisted your words at all.

You still dont get it do you ...i repeat myself over and over again but you dont seem to understand, you keep forcing "arguing about rewalling" on me.

Difference? ...unpreventable - preventable moving of troops <------ i said this idk how many times laochra, its geting annoying

Im not against two walls (never was), there is no move there to try and prevent and no one has any argumment what so ever to go against this.

Madara, Desu understood what i was saying and that i wasnt bringin opinions on rewalling into discussion ...you are doing that, and you are bringin my opinions into it (and thats even my opinions from several months ago) and then others like khal, clovis and thunder jumped on a "lets shit over goblin" wagon.

I could have given my suggestion without knowing what rewalling is ...thats a basic point.

Btw. "argumment" that someone agrees with you, that even bilion people agree with you ...is not an argumment, but a fallacy ad populum.


Now in order to prove me wrong, you would have to prove my fact wrong: > > big wall rewalling is unpreventable move

And then give me an argumment what is the tehnical difference between one unpreventable move from another <----- idk about personal feels, only tehnicality and above stated ad populum i dont care about or would care no matter what the general opinion is.

Get it finaly? ...give me tehnical argumments, not opinions ...everyone has one, but there cant be hundred different AW mechanics.

Napisano przez Guest, 24.10.2014 at 06:58

Holy God these quote walls stop everyone.

Btw Waffel link me your counter-argument vs Tunder's, the one that invloves 1st turn WFing (not saying any of you do it)

Ehh, I had plenty of those they are at the page before this I think.

Napisano przez Khal.eesi, 13.10.2014 at 16:44

This convo............................................................

omg I just read it all back from page 1 and I ''laguiged'' my ass off xDDDDDD
this convo between goblin and w4r even tho they meant they same thing. D'oh

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:14

Napisano przez Khal.eesi, 13.10.2014 at 16:44

This convo............................................................

omg I just read it all back from page 1 and I ''laguiged'' my ass off xDDDDDD
this convo between goblin and w4r even tho they meant they same thing. D'oh

ikr.. atwar best comedy show

Napisano przez Khal.eesi, 24.10.2014 at 08:20

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:14

Napisano przez Khal.eesi, 13.10.2014 at 16:44

This convo............................................................

omg I just read it all back from page 1 and I ''laguiged'' my ass off xDDDDDD
this convo between goblin and w4r even tho they meant they same thing. D'oh

ikr.. atwar best comedy show

true dat

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 06:39

Maybe tell why they are lies? Because this is the problem, you say things without actually discribing why they are lies or what is wrong.
I could say all you do is telling lies and my point is right, but I am not doing that. I tell you why I think that, and how. I dont see any effort from your side, therefore I dont really think you are being serious at all but just trolling.

There is no point in trying to tell you why they are lies, madmen see what they see.

I already proved that your justification to wf big walls turn 1 is illogical, i will assume you don't have a proper answer and you are just trying to lie your way out of a explanation.

If a neutral person reads my last 2 post and he comes to the conclusion that you are a lier, then this argument was worth it, in the future to prevent a 14 page autistic debate, you can be dismiss as a lier.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

What do you call it then besides exploiting the rules? You guys use something that will 100% effects people gameplay, the only counter to it is using WF turn 1. I also explained this million times to you, i seriously wonder why you still dont get it?

why would you call it anything other than double walling? theres no rules or inter-player agreements regarding this to exploit. There is no logical reason to have a problem with it. You're vaguely grasping at reasons to ban it, but there are none. Just because theres no legal counter is not a reason to ban it. Some countries benefit from a double wall, others do not, some need it if using a strat with weak defense(gw/blitz). Its a strategic move that has been used since atwar began. You and goblin may hate it, and youve every right to do so, but it does not give you the right to first turn wf, or enforce your opinions on others.

Thats all there is to "get" on this. So i dont get why you keep posting it. I am not going to start agreeing with you just because you repeat yourself.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

You guys expect us to be fine and when we arent you guys are saying ''we aint doing anything against the rules''

You are the one who keeps mentioning rules, everything i posted is 100% true. Illyria isnt doing anything wrong, you however are breaking the one rule/etiquette that we have on aw. Attempting again and again to justify why wont change this.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

I didnt say illyria broke rules for the 50th times. Stop repeating that I do say this or whatever.
I did say mention about the exploiting the other thread too, but this shows that you actually dont read everything and just hop in.w

i never said that you did, i already responded to this, i assume you didnt comprehend what i said since you felt the need to repeat yourself.

However you did accuse me of exploiting rules, this is a completely false accusation, i read everything you said in the atwar recordbook yet it is still a completely false accusation. Explain yourself please.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

Yes I did say I would WF, and I would do it anytime soon. Like I said you are exploiting the rules by using this wall and when people complain about it, you justfy yourself by saying ''its legit move so dont cry'', this is selfish.

HOW am i exploiting the rules using this wall. Would you stop repeating yourself and answer my questions please. There are no known rules regarding double walling to exploit. It is a legit move so yes you should stop crying. This isnt selfish its simply a fact. Please quote this rule that you keep mentioning im exploting if it exists.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

You also ''forgot or ''ignored'' bonkers, and I guess you did because simply he disagreed with you, you only called the names of the people who did agree with you. Which shows how the way you make your ''legit'' arguements.

i did not forget bonker, bonker has a slightly different opinion to you and goblin. You would understand this if youd read his posts.

Do not attempt to discredit what i am saying by accusing me of an agenda. Everyone who did agree with me in this thread was quoted and in some cases subsequently attacked by you for their opinion. You goblin syrian mou and w4r, nobody else as of yet has supported you.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

Why would goblin and I consider ourselfs as minority? Because the people (and some of them never play 3v3's or any competitive games, i think they know themself who I am reffering to.) are saying that we are wrong?

It doesn't matter what they play, theyre entitled to their opinions, just like you are, and you should stop attempting to discredit them.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

Only person who made atleast sense from all of them was you, because yes you talked around some of the things, but you didn't go off-topic, you didnt use other threads to prove your statements. like clovis and tunder.
Its becomming an common sense lao that you never try to make an solution but only stand on your own points and never accept others

This is wrong, i read and accepted what desu said, even if i didnt agree with all of it, i also had to accept what bonker said. You and goblin are simply horrible at attempting to apply reason and logic. Why should i attempt to find a solution to a problem you have created? Why should i have to change the way i play because you dislike double walls and suddenly feel its ok to wf me to prevent them? I am not going to bend over backwards trying to please you. Ive played 100s of games vs you goblin w4r mou and syrian yet now you guys suddenly trying to force made up rules down my throat because you cant handle a double wall. and are going to break the 1 rule we do have to prevent them.

I can simply choose to not play you guys, which is what i am doing. I hardly play aw these days, in the games i do play i dont want to be first turn wf'd then laughed at.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 08:29

My proof about mentioning that I would start WF'ing is here, I have also said it multiple times in the game it self, in clanwars/spectatorchats/ even PR.
I even explained how I would WF so it wouldn't harm standard triangle walls. As you can see I am caring about if I wrong guessed it wouldn't harm.

did you not read my response to this already?

Napisano przez Tundy, 24.10.2014 at 08:40

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 06:39

Maybe tell why they are lies? Because this is the problem, you say things without actually discribing why they are lies or what is wrong.
I could say all you do is telling lies and my point is right, but I am not doing that. I tell you why I think that, and how. I dont see any effort from your side, therefore I dont really think you are being serious at all but just trolling.

There is no point in trying to tell you why they are lies, madmen see what they see.

I already proved that your justification to wf big walls turn 1 is illogical, i will assume you don't have a proper answer and you are just trying to lie your way out of a explanation.

If a neutral person reads my last 2 post and he comes to the conclusion that you are a lier, then this argument was worth it, in the future to prevent a 14 page autistic debate, you can be dismiss as a lier.

Bro? I have proved everything you asked me, you are coming with random SS's from threads that dont matter, you put me as a liar in this thread now even tho I told you everything you basically asked for? Now I tell you how can you justify calling me a liar, when you have no proof about that I lied about it? All my statements were things you said in this thread. So idk from where you get the guts to call me a liar here? You say '' if the only counter for a move is to WF turn 1, why should we allow walls at all?''
So basically you want to remove like 1 or 2 or 3 kinda pretty important things from the game, only because 1 player wants to play with biggwalls? Which cant even tell me why its justified that biggwall is legal, but the wf not?

This is really the best logic I have ever heard in years.

Napisano przez Waffel, 24.10.2014 at 10:58

So basically you want to remove like 1 or 2 or 3 kinda pretty important things from the game, only because 1 player wants to play with biggwalls? Which cant even tell me why its justified that biggwall is legal, but the wf not?

Holyshit, this is the best example of your twisted view of reality, you are behaving as if you were the victim and double-layers were breaking the rules, when in fact: you are the person that is breaking the "no wf turn 1" rule.

You keep talking about rules that double layer breaks, were does it say that double layer walls are illegal? You have to accept that there is unpreventable moves in atwar, just because they are unpreventable, doesn't mean that they must be illegal or have no weakness.

Examples of unpreventable moves:

I can't prevent you from recruiting units
I can't prevent movement of stealth units
I can't prevent you from walling your cap turn 1
I can't prevent you from moving your units turn 1
I can't prevent you from moving units that are walled
I can't prevent you from sending money to allies if you have money
I can't prevent you from breaking my wall

Etc, there is countless of examples.

The only rule in AtWar is no wfing turn 1, must we vote to make it more specific. So people with no ethics and no sportsmanship can understand them? Ok:

No wfing walls in enemy territory turn 1.
There no more drama plz

Napisano przez Goblin, 24.10.2014 at 07:01

Now in order to prove me wrong, you would have to prove my fact wrong: > > big wall rewalling is unpreventable move

Nobody has ever said that big wall re-walling is preventable.

Are you saying that unpreventable moves are bad?

1)wfing is unpreventable
2) making capital walls turn 1 is unpreventable
3) movement of stealth units is unpreventable
4) moving units that are walled is unpreventable
5) can't prevent you from breaking my walls

Etc

Goblin, your fact bears no weight to the argument of double walls being unethical/bad/illegal
Unless you are trying to imply that unpreventable moves are so, in which case i already provided you examples of unpreventable moves that are used in a common basis during competitive gameplay.

Ill guess i have to beg the question:

Why can you wf my advanced capital wall, and i can't wf your basic capital wall? are we removing the no wf turn 1 rule, because some individuals can't handle advanced walls?

How about this:

If it is possible to do under current game mechanics, then why should it be condemned?

A game where you have to defend your cap right from turn 2 sounds pretty fun.

Napisano przez Tundy, 24.10.2014 at 11:34

Nobody has ever said that big wall re-walling is preventable.

Are you saying that unpreventable moves are bad?

1)wfing is unpreventable
2) making capital walls turn 1 is unpreventable
3) movement of stealth units is unpreventable
4) moving units that are walled is unpreventable
5) can't prevent you from breaking my walls

I gave my definition on what i mean by unpreventable move ...you didnt read it of course.

Let me repeat it and show you that i left no loop holes for anyone to act all smart on me:

A unpreventable move is a move that your opponent cant prevent with by 1. USING HIS MOVES and 2. ACCORDING TO GAME MECHANICS

Number 1. and 2. have to both be accumulated by this definition.

So lets see:
1) wf is unpreventable on turn 1 (shouldnt be used) ...on all other turns it IS PREVENTABLE, its possible to stop your opponents wf unit (unless walled - in that case look at number 2. acording to game mechanics)
2) making capital wall turn 1 is preventable of course with first turn wall fuck (unpreventable move - shouldnt be used)
3) stealth units - look at my definition under 2. (according to game mechanics)
4) walled unit movements - again look at my definition under 2. (according to game mechanics)
5) of course you can, its possible to attack the units and block them from breaking your walls (unless they are walled - in that case look at number 2. according to game mechanics)

So, please ...if your gona argue with me, first read what i wrote and then try to think if you have argumments that hold water.

Napisano przez International, 24.10.2014 at 11:50

How about this:

If it is possible to do under current game mechanics, then why should it be condemned?

A game where you have to defend your cap right from turn 2 sounds pretty fun.

It's not.

Napisano przez Goblin, 24.10.2014 at 12:04

Napisano przez Tundy, 24.10.2014 at 11:34

Nobody has ever said that big wall re-walling is preventable.

Are you saying that unpreventable moves are bad?

1)wfing is unpreventable
2) making capital walls turn 1 is unpreventable
3) movement of stealth units is unpreventable
4) moving units that are walled is unpreventable
5) can't prevent you from breaking my walls

I gave my definition on what i mean by unpreventable move ...you didnt read it of course.

Let me repeat it and show you that i left no loop holes for anyone to act all smart on me:

A unpreventable move is a move that your opponent cant prevent with by 1. USING HIS MOVES and 2. ACCORDING TO GAME MECHANICS

Number 1. and 2. have to both be accumulated by this definition.

So lets see:
1) wf is unpreventable on turn 1 (shouldnt be used) ...on all other turns it IS PREVENTABLE, its possible to stop your opponents wf unit (unless walled - in that case look at number 2. acording to game mechanics)
2) making capital wall turn 1 is preventable of course with first turn wall fuck (unpreventable move - shouldnt be used)
3) stealth units - look at my definition under 2. (according to game mechanics)
4) walled unit movements - again look at my definition under 2. (according to game mechanics)
5) of course you can, its possible to attack the units and block them from breaking your walls (unless they are walled - in that case look at number 2. according to game mechanics)

So, please ...if your gona argue with me, first read what i wrote and then try to think if you have argumments that hold water.

Big walls fall under definition 2, and the new wall falls under definition 4.

In other words, your definition covers big walls too.

Tunders correct, you cant just make up reasons to ban something you dont like, as we have all agreed the only widely accepted rule is no first turn wf. Anything else beyond that is individual player opinion.

This is a strategy game, double walls can be both an advantage and a disadvantage as ive explained, i dont see the problem and i disagree with the arguments youve both presented. This is simply a difference of opinion.

However the problem is that you guys seek to break the first turn wf rule in order to counter the double walls which you dislike. This is where we have a problem.

I never addressed goblins rule proposal since i find it outrageous that him and waffel would suddenly attempt to have something completely legit banned because they dont like it. i can accept rewalling and serb walling being banned since a large portion of the community complain about it, but if you want to justify first turn wfs and banning double walling, you're going to have to go find a lot more support and better reasoning before i at least will even consider changing my gameplay to suit your tastes.

Napisano przez Tundy, 24.10.2014 at 12:23

Big walls fall under definition 2, and the new wall falls under definition 4.

In other words, your definition covers big walls too.

Good point ...after i posted the first message i thought of this and thought you might think of that.

Keep in mind my definition was meant to be as a rule only for turn 1 and turn 2 and was suppose to be about walls, not units.

This is where i made a mistake i admit ...i made it about moves while this is about walls.

According to that i should change my definition:
A unpreventable new wall is a move that your opponent couldnt prevent by using units.


So two rules for first and second turn:

Turn 1 rule: dont wall fuck your opponents territorial walls
Turn 2 rule: dont use turn 1 rule to create unfuckable walls

Napisano przez Permamuted, 24.10.2014 at 12:49

I never addressed goblins rule proposal since i find it outrageous that him and waffel would suddenly attempt to have something completely legit banned because they dont like it. i can accept rewalling and serb walling being banned since a large portion of the community complain about it, but if you want to justify first turn wfs and banning double walling, you're going to have to go find a lot more support and better reasoning before i at least will even consider changing my gameplay to suit your tastes.

Jesus christ Laochra are you being an idiot on purpose or what?

• this topic started with me arguing w4r about his first turn wall fuck on you -- so how em i justifying first turn wf

• we never, ever said double walling should be baned -- you are pissing me off for repeating that after i said that already 6 times

• you are not making double walls get that into your head and stop using something you dont do as an argumment -- you are creating a new unfuckable wall turn after

• i accepted rewalling and serbian rewalling as a legit moves since they are preventable wall moves


• i even proposed that you just fuckin leave 3 units in your capital when making big wall and still you are not happy and still you continue to spread bullshit about what i said


Learn how to debate btw. ....Thunder is a boss compared to you for his last post to me.

Do what you want, i wont stop you i wont wall fuck you i never would ...this is a fuckin game, but it seems you would rather die then compromise on something.