GOP Primary~~

Vote and say why!!

Remove Kasich...

Fuck trump

Napisano przez clovis1122, 12.04.2016 at 20:08

snip
I love Kasich

Me too bud, me too

Kasich=Bae Go Kasich Go Kasich Go Kasich!

The only way Kaisich gets the nomination is if it goes to a convention and he gets it there, and if Kaisich gets the nomination when he doesn't have nearly enough of the delegates from the primary, it gaurentees a loss for the Republicans because voters will feel (rightly so) that Trump was cheated out of the nomination, and most registered republicans, myself included, will still vote for Trump when he runs independent

The cucking is strong in this thread.

Heil Trump and the burger race

The fact that the establishment has bi partisan support on destroying a single man doesn't throw up red flags to any of you? This system has gone to hell and the only indication I need to vote Donald Trump is how difficult everyone is trying to make it for his victory. Then you got the sheeple, who know nothing but what they are fed attacking a man they know nothing about.

Donald Trump will win this and you cant stop him

Lets go
Trump2016

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too

Napisano przez For Antioch, 12.04.2016 at 21:29

Trump is a fascist. He favors large government and nationalism. He cries about the system being unfair, rather than working within it confines like every candidate has for 200 years. He has absolutely no plans, nor any idea how the country works. He's afraid to debate because then people will know he can't talk about the issues. I will never understand how anyone could support him.

Kasich would probably win going up against Hillary, but he doesn't appeal to most of the GOP for his more moderate views and has no chance of winning at this point. So, I'm not wasting a vote there.

Last standing is Cruz. He's a decent guy, who has focused on the issues rather than insulting the other candidates. He's a strong constitutionalist, with plans to reduce government size and allow the economy to grow. Since I can't have Rand, this is as good as it gets.

Easy choice.

Maybe, but remember he is the only candidate who wants peace with Russia.

He might achieve something no other US president did - normal relations with Russia, end of Cold War and reduction of WMD.

That mean, whatever his policies are - he can be the greatest president America ever had, as he will secure long-lasting peace and international cooperation instead confrontation.

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too

So all these lies about trump never having a chance for the presidency aren't true.

Napisano przez For Antioch, 12.04.2016 at 21:29

I will never understand how anyone could support him.

Same, as why we Greeks voted for the leftist Tsipras. We knew he was a risk, but A.) The other choices were shit, one of the same old and B.) What helli said, when corrupted media and rotten establishment attack a person so relentlessly and consistently, theres something to it.
Although, if he gets elected, the big corpos and the elite will probably find ways to subdue him, just like EU did with our p.m.

Kaisich needs to drop out, Rubio had more support and he had the sense to leave

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too
snip

Except when the choice is between him and Hillary:

Napisano przez clovis1122, 12.04.2016 at 20:08

Remove Kasich...

haha , you could say.. Trumps head is in the clouds hahaha lol

Kasich still gets my vote. Although I think Trump will win, I want to stand by my principles. I don't feel Trump will win against Queen Killary and Cruz is just a religious nut so there's no way I am giving him my vote. I'll still vote for trump in november if (or when ) he runs for november. But I think we're all be screwed with the lying witch of the left.

Napisano przez Pheonixking929, 13.04.2016 at 16:47

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too
snip

Except when the choice is between him and Hillary:

Nice poles lol Huffington post lol?

Napisano przez Pheonixking929, 13.04.2016 at 16:47

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too
snip

Except when the choice is between him and Hillary:

snip

NOTE: trump has stated many times he hasn't started on Hillary yet, he is focused on the nomination first and foremost.

Napisano przez Helly, 13.04.2016 at 18:38

Napisano przez Pheonixking929, 13.04.2016 at 16:47

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too
snip

Except when the choice is between him and Hillary:

Nice poles lol Huffington post lol?

My bad. Forgot Huffington post made up that poll for democratic conspiracy to make Kasich win the nomination so Clinton will win general election.

I've actually watched majority of all the GOP debates and even though I'm not American (thank god), all GOP candidates are shit.

Kasich is clearly there to make it to a disputed convention and just fuck with both Cruz and Trump (more with Trump)

Cruz is a religious cuck who says things that even to me are nonsense and doesn't have any notion of what the world is outside of America's borders

Trump is a demagogue and uses simple language to extend to a wider electorate (smart choice). Even though I think he's retarded for defending the temporary ban/restriction on the coming of Muslims to America, and the construction of a bigger wall on the border with Mexico, that would cost tons of money (I'd say investing more in Border Patrol would be cheaper, and better..).

Now, this is what I 'like in Trump. He has good, smart intentions on the Middle East, I recall that he said in a debate that US has been in the Middle East for 15 years and hasn't gotten anything from it, only problems, hate, and terrorist attacks and that US wasted 1 trillion dollars there, for nothing, without any benefits whatsoever.

The second thing I liked about him is that he publically and strongly admits that US invasion of Iraq was a mistake that doomed the whole region (true).

The third thing I like about him is that he actually has peaceful (smart policies) towards Russia, looking for world peace and normal friendly relations with Russia, which if proved, can be a huge benefit to the World and the US foreign policy itself.

The fourth thing I sort of agree with him but it's still not that clear is that he criticises the defense agreements US has with South Korea (Soldiers allocated in DMZ, that leads to unecessary expenses by the US with no benefits to the USA whatsoever) and Saudi Arabia (considering the fact Saudi Arabia at one point was making 1 billion a day and US wasn't getting paid for its forces deployed in Saudi Arabia to defend the country, which isn't fair).

However, Trump criticises the fact that US is the bulk of NATO and 'takes charge' of defending Europe (NATO members) without getting paid. Even tho he is right, that US has troops in europe for protection and doesn't get paid for it, he sort of forgets to mention that Europe (and also NATO members in it) in its vast majority has Treaties/Contracts with the US to purchase American-made weaponry, which translates in income for the US (so I guess US does get paid, even if indirectly, for its service in Europe, I guess..)

The fifth and final thing I like about Trump, is that he stands for economic protectionist policies to boost the US economy and industries, thus reducing the negative balance of trade between US and other countries like China, and generating jobs and boost the economy, as said. I like that he actually stands for having rough economic policies towards China, to make the trade balance positive/balanced with that country, rather than seeing the US markets flooded with cheap chinese goods.

( I remember you that US Industries in the 1860's, right after the Civil War, were able to exponentially grow due to Protectionist policies, like high tariffs and stuff imposed by the US Government to allow the national Industries to grow, develop so that they could later compete in the outside).

Napisano przez Al Fappino, 13.04.2016 at 19:28

The fourth thing I sort of agree with him but it's still not that clear is that he criticises the defense agreements US has with South Korea (Soldiers allocated in DMZ, that leads to unecessary expenses by the US with no benefits to the USA whatsoever)

I'm all for keeping troops in South Korea because the moment we pull out of the region North Korea is going to go ahead and invade it.

Napisano przez Dereny, 13.04.2016 at 19:33

Napisano przez Al Fappino, 13.04.2016 at 19:28

The fourth thing I sort of agree with him but it's still not that clear is that he criticises the defense agreements US has with South Korea (Soldiers allocated in DMZ, that leads to unecessary expenses by the US with no benefits to the USA whatsoever)

I'm all for keeping troops in South Korea because the moment we pull out of the region North Korea is going to go ahead and invade it.

then those troops should be maintained by South Korea and not the US government, or at least South Korea should pay half of the maintenance cost of that Army there.

Napisano przez Al Fappino, 13.04.2016 at 19:37

Napisano przez Dereny, 13.04.2016 at 19:33

Napisano przez Al Fappino, 13.04.2016 at 19:28

The fourth thing I sort of agree with him but it's still not that clear is that he criticises the defense agreements US has with South Korea (Soldiers allocated in DMZ, that leads to unecessary expenses by the US with no benefits to the USA whatsoever)

I'm all for keeping troops in South Korea because the moment we pull out of the region North Korea is going to go ahead and invade it.

then those troops should be maintained by South Korea and not the US government, or at least South Korea should pay half of the maintenance cost of that Army there.

South Korea pays us over $866 million for a little over 25k people. That's a significant amount, 34k per person.

Napisano przez Pheonixking929, 13.04.2016 at 18:59

Napisano przez Helly, 13.04.2016 at 18:38

Napisano przez Pheonixking929, 13.04.2016 at 16:47

Napisano przez Nero, 13.04.2016 at 14:21

Napisano przez Zenith, 13.04.2016 at 14:11

Trump wins what, all atWar polls?

No actually
He wins real polls too
snip

Except when the choice is between him and Hillary:

Nice poles lol Huffington post lol?

My bad. Forgot Huffington post made up that poll for democratic conspiracy to make Kasich win the nomination so Clinton will win general election.

That is correct Huffington post are liars. The other iv never heard of. BTW you makelight of a serious issue that is actually happening, and if hillary is elected illegally were gonna burn it all down.

Hillary will be next president. End of story.

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 13.04.2016 at 22:42

Hillary will be next president. End of story.

IN SOVIET RUSSIA
HILLARY VOTES FIR YOU