@TheFuehrer Flat Earth Concept

Ancient Greek Astronomy

ps: for those that don't know click it.

Quran also says the earth is flat. Gg

To be honest, you cant know for sure 100% that it isnt flat. Have you been to space and had a good look on our planet? Or do you trust Russian cosmonauts taking pictures from Space Station? You believe in 'round earth' because others told you so, so when Fuhrer say otherwise your arguments against him are invalid. Though he also doesnt have proof because he is only posting videos, and we know movies are not good proof as we have movies about Russian occupation of Norway (2015 movie).

Napisano przez Skanderbeg, 14.09.2015 at 05:06

To be honest, you cant know for sure 100% that it isnt flat.

Oh my.. Why can't I catch the horizons? Everytime I go in that direction I end up seeing another part of my city... It doesn't get any closer, too.

Napisano przez Azula., 14.09.2015 at 04:51

Quran also says the earth is flat. Gg

quran didn't say that stop say shit

Napisano przez Azula., 14.09.2015 at 04:51

Quran also says the earth is flat. Gg

Was gonna write a few sentences, but decided it isn't worth it. Some people are against Islam for the sake of being against it to the point they start making stuff up (like this example right here). Some pitiful people can't actually form a valid opinion because of extreme lack of perspective.

Stryko,

Nice try. I don't believe any television PROGRAM. Especially stuff on the History channel.

I don't simply believe any thing because some one tells me it's true, unlike the feeble-minded.

I lost faith in the History channel when they began having ice road truckers, than pawn stars, and now Samuel Adams jumping around Boston like he's in an Assassins Creed movie (and don't get me started on Texas Rising...)

Napisano przez theFuehrer, 14.09.2015 at 11:57

Stryko,

Nice try. I don't believe any television PROGRAM. Especially stuff on the History channel.

I don't simply believe any thing because some one tells me it's true, unlike the feeble-minded.

the earth is flat? XAXA

Flat brain best brain

Really?

You'd trust the teachings of the Ancient Greeks, people that rolled newborn babies down pyramids hundreds of years ago to please the Gods over new age scientific theories and technology?

The Earth is flat. WAKE UP SHEEPLE.

Napisano przez Guest, 11.09.2015 at 05:06

Ancient Greek Astronomy

ps: for those that don't know click it.

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:38

Really?

You'd trust the teachings of the Ancient Greeks, people that rolled newborn babies down pyramids hundreds of years ago to please the Gods over new age scientific theories and technology?

The Earth is flat. WAKE UP SHEEPLE.

I love you.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:39

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

Because AtWar uses a so-called cylindrical projection map where the image only conjoins on the horizontal plane to simplify the coding process. If I'm not too incorrect, I believe Google Earth has full 3D-projection

EDIT: 100th post

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:15

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:39

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

Because AtWar uses a so-called cylindrical projection map where the image only conjoins on the horizontal plane to simplify the coding process. If I'm not too incorrect, I believe Google Earth has full 3D-projection

EDIT: 100th post

>Using Google as a resource.

Try a book sometime.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:18

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:15

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:39

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

Because AtWar uses a so-called cylindrical projection map where the image only conjoins on the horizontal plane to simplify the coding process. If I'm not too incorrect, I believe Google Earth has full 3D-projection

EDIT: 100th post

>Using Google as a resource.

Not many applications benefit in a major way by using full 3d-map projection as opposed to 2d cylindrical ones

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:19

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:18

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:15

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:39

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

Because AtWar uses a so-called cylindrical projection map where the image only conjoins on the horizontal plane to simplify the coding process. If I'm not too incorrect, I believe Google Earth has full 3D-projection

EDIT: 100th post

>Using Google as a resource.

Not many applications benefit in a major way by using full 3d-map projection as opposed to 2d cylindrical ones

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

I bet most of you think the government did 9/11 and faked the moon landing as well.
Bunch of brainwashed fools.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

Agreed to Disagree.

Hello clovis bye clovis.

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:28

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

You get your ideas of relative size of our planet from the same liars that claim our Earth is round.

You are delusional, face it.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:33

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:28

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

You get your ideas of relative size of our planet from the same liars that claim our Earth is round.

You are delusional, face it.

And how exactly do you justify the notion that the Earth is flat when most of the structure of matter from smallest part(quarks) to largest part(sun) is spherical?

Napisano przez Guest, 14.09.2015 at 16:32

Agreed to Disagree.

Hello clovis bye clovis.

No response to the video I posted? Amazing how I can show you solid evidence, yet you just throw it out the window. Shows how brainwashed you are.

Next time don't call me out on any thing, especially if you are going to use stuff from TV.

Napisano przez theFuehrer, 14.09.2015 at 16:39

No response to the video I posted? Amazing how I can show you solid evidence

Sorry i laugh to much when i see edited parts from movies like matrix

I always btw. return too ...why did flath earthers falsificate the findings of the curvature of water experiment? Because it proved them absolutely wrong.

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:39

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:33

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:28

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

You get your ideas of relative size of our planet from the same liars that claim our Earth is round.

You are delusional, face it.

And how exactly do you justify the notion that the Earth is flat when most of the structure of matter from smallest part(quarks) to largest part(sun) is spherical?

Are you implying that our Sun is the largest subject of matter?

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:44

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:39

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:33

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:28

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

You get your ideas of relative size of our planet from the same liars that claim our Earth is round.

You are delusional, face it.

And how exactly do you justify the notion that the Earth is flat when most of the structure of matter from smallest part(quarks) to largest part(sun) is spherical?

Are you implying that our Sun is the largest subject of matter?

It's the largest close enough to observe with sufficient accuracy, but of course there are larger and heavier objects. But saying the sun is more simple than for example, saying Cygnus X-1

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:47

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:44

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:39

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:33

Napisano przez 5th SS Wiking, 14.09.2015 at 16:28

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:21

That has nothing to do with anything mate.

You should quit making false and irrelevant accusations such as the fact AtWar can possibly be anything but 100 percent accurate.

AtWar IS highly inaccurate in many ways, for example cylindrical projection is known to oversize terrain close to the poles

You get your ideas of relative size of our planet from the same liars that claim our Earth is round.

You are delusional, face it.

And how exactly do you justify the notion that the Earth is flat when most of the structure of matter from smallest part(quarks) to largest part(sun) is spherical?

Are you implying that our Sun is the largest subject of matter?

It's the largest close enough to observe with sufficient accuracy, but of course there are larger and heavier objects. But saying the sun is more simple than for example, saying Cygnus X-1

That's not true, if we look at the Sun our eyes hurt.

As I said in the other thread, the Sun is made up of purely Lions.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 16:48

That's not true, if we look at the Sun our eyes hurt.

As I said in the other thread, the Sun is made up of purely Lions.

You use a filter, or a detector set on another wavelength of light.
Considering how immensely hot the Sun is, the Lions would evaporate instantly and form elemental Carbon, Hydrogen and Oxygen with minor amounts of other materials as well.

Napisano przez Sheba, 14.09.2015 at 15:39

Napisano przez Guest, 11.09.2015 at 05:06

Ancient Greek Astronomy

ps: for those that don't know click it.

If the Earth isn't flat, then why isn't the map on AtWar round?

Checkmate.

*looks at board*

>Former names: Scientology

Game. Set. Match.