Most people do not wish to read anything academically inclined, yes.
For good reason. A lot of social science literature is poorly written. If you have a good argument, make it intelligibly and concisely. There's nothing big brained about throwing a word salad + unnecessary cites to "experts" at me. (Orwell, Politics and the English Language)
Final rule,
Ignore all previous rules to avoid sounding barbaric.
So basically what you're saying is that even if something you did merely affected you and not others, it's still unacceptable because it's "sinful" or some other reason why the nanny state should be empowered so that ADULTS are not able to make their own choices? Ok....
No that isn't what I'm saying. And I never used anything resembling the word sin either. I said exactly what I mean a few posts up so there's no point in misrepresenting me.
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
Or-- in other words-- you have no satisfactory rebuttal.
You make so many unrelated claims I can't possibly bother to answer them all.
"brevity is the soul of wit"
Wait so you don't believe laws and regulation dictate people's morals and therefore don't perceive them "as a consequence of positively-associated negative desires as a means to an end."(garde,2018)?
Wait so you don't believe laws and regulation dictate people's morals and therefore don't perceive them "as a consequence of positively-associated negative desires as a means to an end."(garde,2018)?
Obviously only within sufficiently conditional limitations, i.e., any well established heuristic will consider process and substance in unison. Legal analysis which separates moral form from practical function precludes both. Duh!
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
Wait so you don't believe laws and regulation dictate people's morals and therefore don't perceive them "as a consequence of positively-associated negative desires as a means to an end."(garde,2018)?
Obviously only within sufficiently conditional limitations, i.e., any well established heuristic will consider process and substance in unison. Legal analysis which separates moral form from practical function precludes both. Duh!
It's cute seeing both of you jerk each other off like this. Why, if I wasn't mistaken, I'd say that you sound pretty mad! And don't sound so sardonic, I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured- I would have summoned someone like 4nic to argue on your behalf however, a bowl of buttered mashed potatoes is not a suitable foil for your otherwise uninformed approach to sociological issues.
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
Not mad (I don't take arguments personally, especially internet ones), and not interested in debating you for reasons already stated. Pretty funny that you think I read this Fuller person (never heard of him) when I literally just typed up gibberish off the top of my head. That fact says it all for me.
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
Not mad (I don't take arguments personally, especially internet ones), and not interested in debating you for reasons already stated. Pretty funny that you think I read this Fuller person (never heard of him) when I literally just typed up gibberish off the top of my head. That fact says it all for me.
"it's only a game bro, i'm just pretending to be retarded"
It's cute seeing both of you jerk each other off like this. Why, if I wasn't mistaken, I'd say that you sound pretty mad! And don't sound so sardonic, I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured- I would have summoned someone like 4nic to argue on your behalf however, a bowl of buttered mashed potatoes is not a suitable foil for your otherwise uninformed approach to sociological issues.
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
It has come to my attention lately that you have a habit of pretending to be an authority on subjects which you clearly know little about. It is very easy for anyone with half a brain or even just a dictionary in your case to separate the pretentious from the sincere.
"I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured"
It's cute seeing both of you jerk each other off like this. Why, if I wasn't mistaken, I'd say that you sound pretty mad! And don't sound so sardonic, I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured- I would have summoned someone like 4nic to argue on your behalf however, a bowl of buttered mashed potatoes is not a suitable foil for your otherwise uninformed approach to sociological issues.
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
It has come to my attention lately that you have a habit of pretending to be an authority on subjects which you clearly know little about. It is very easy for anyone with half a brain or even just a dictionary in your case to separate the pretentious from the sincere.
"I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured"
Seriously? Do you even proof-read what you write?
How dare you. scoundrel.
He is a smart upper class citizen, no time for him to mingle and argue with a rapscallion such as yourself.
You fiend.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Its like everyones high af while posting shit on this thread. But this is not a good weed. This is some paranoid moon is made of cheese weed.
still fun tho
It's cute seeing both of you jerk each other off like this. Why, if I wasn't mistaken, I'd say that you sound pretty mad! And don't sound so sardonic, I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured- I would have summoned someone like 4nic to argue on your behalf however, a bowl of buttered mashed potatoes is not a suitable foil for your otherwise uninformed approach to sociological issues.
Nonetheless, nice job reading Fuller for fifteen minutes, next you'll begin misusing substance over form and claim it to be a hallmark of antimoralism. Still though; you haven't made a rebuttal.
It has come to my attention lately that you have a habit of pretending to be an authority on subjects which you clearly know little about. It is very easy for anyone with half a brain or even just a dictionary in your case to separate the pretentious from the sincere.
"I understand far too well the necessity by which you have endured"
Seriously? Do you even proof-read what you write?
It's as though you're projecting right now or something! And my apologies if it has become uncommon in potatoland to speak fluently. Should I bust out a singalong and a coloring activity for you, too? You've got to be the shortest tree in the forest, I swear.
Come on guys, im sure someone here is smarter and speak equally high evel english as garde. Some one do it!
Also, as an ex junky turned healthy,productive and succesfull semi-god my opinion is that junkies, potheads, drunks and gamblers should be euthanised. As a second option i would agree to move them all in specific areas (like ghetto but not for niggers) and they lose wellfare, social benefits, free healthcare and the right to have children. Other than that they can do whatever they want to their bodies and keep being unproductive parasites that die soon and help us with the whole overpopulation problem.
Come on guys, im sure someone here is smarter and speak equally high evel english as garde. Some one do it!
Also, as an ex junky turned healthy,productive and succesfull semi-god my opinion is that junkies, potheads, drunks and gamblers should be euthanised. As a second option i would agree to move them all in specific areas (like ghetto but not for niggers) and they lose wellfare, social benefits, free healthcare and the right to have children. Other than that they can do whatever they want to their bodies and keep being unproductive parasites that die soon and help us with the whole overpopulation problem.
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
Come on guys, im sure someone here is smarter and speak equally high evel english as garde. Some one do it!
Also, as an ex junky turned healthy,productive and succesfull semi-god my opinion is that junkies, potheads, drunks and gamblers should be euthanised. As a second option i would agree to move them all in specific areas (like ghetto but not for niggers) and they lose wellfare, social benefits, free healthcare and the right to have children. Other than that they can do whatever they want to their bodies and keep being unproductive parasites that die soon and help us with the whole overpopulation problem.
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
Nice responding 24h later after upvoting.
Did you woke up on the wrong side of the bed today? D
Come on guys, im sure someone here is smarter and speak equally high evel english as garde. Some one do it!
Also, as an ex junky turned healthy,productive and succesfull semi-god my opinion is that junkies, potheads, drunks and gamblers should be euthanised. As a second option i would agree to move them all in specific areas (like ghetto but not for niggers) and they lose wellfare, social benefits, free healthcare and the right to have children. Other than that they can do whatever they want to their bodies and keep being unproductive parasites that die soon and help us with the whole overpopulation problem.
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
Nice responding 24h later after upvoting.
Did you woke up on the wrong side of the bed today? D
how u even keep track of these things
ahhhahahhahah
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Come on guys, im sure someone here is smarter and speak equally high evel english as garde. Some one do it!
Also, as an ex junky turned healthy,productive and succesfull semi-god my opinion is that junkies, potheads, drunks and gamblers should be euthanised. As a second option i would agree to move them all in specific areas (like ghetto but not for niggers) and they lose wellfare, social benefits, free healthcare and the right to have children. Other than that they can do whatever they want to their bodies and keep being unproductive parasites that die soon and help us with the whole overpopulation problem.
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
Nice responding 24h later after upvoting.
Did you woke up on the wrong side of the bed today? D
how u even keep track of these things
ahhhahahhahah
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
That is correct dear Laochra. I should have been put away, i was just lucky
Nice hitleresque philosophy. Imo we should just euthanize the entire greek population. This would free up cash in the EU and we could use the land to grow olives and other mediterranean goodies to feed the worlds growing populations. It would also have the side benefit of stopping cc and viva from logging aw. It would be with great regret however that i would give up my khaleesi. But we must all make sacrifices for the greater good!
That is correct dear Laochra. I should have been put away, i was just lucky
You always were the type to take 1 good thing and run with it to the expense of all other good things. The old anarchist Khal put freedom above all else, and wouldn't concede one iota to any authority for any reason. The new Khal is willing to deprive all but a select few of the most basic freedoms (to life, health, children) so as to protect the integrity of society, and separate the good people from the bad apples.
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
By your own standards you would've been euthanized before you had the chance to pull yourself together. Nice compassion.
That is correct dear Laochra. I should have been put away, i was just lucky
Nice hitleresque philosophy. Imo we should just euthanize the entire greek population. This would free up cash in the EU and we could use the land to grow olives and other mediterranean goodies to feed the worlds growing populations. It would also have the side benefit of stopping cc and viva from logging aw. It would be with great regret however that i would give up my khaleesi. But we must all make sacrifices for the greater good!
This is why i would hold the exact opposite view... that people are free to do whatever they choose (provided it doesn't 'harm' others or prevent them from exercising their free will. Defining 'harm' may appear somewhat arbitrary, but can generally be negotiated on an individual to individual basis.)
You make some good points but I'd still hesitate before making such grand statements. We all know that without legal prohibition or at least social pressures from authorities people will freely make some truly shitty decisions. Is it cool if I freely choose to sell my organs, sell my vote? Sell myself into slavery? If I join a cult of 100 people and we all freely decide to drink the Kool Aid is that a ok? What if two people freely choose to duel, should we as a society accept such behavior? If a father and his adult daughter freely consent, should we be bothered that they want to have sex? The balancing of freedom and authority is actually quite complex (and interesting) when we look at examples.
Yup, i like the examples you give. Each could be a forum discussion on it's own. Duels and suicide (either sole or en masse) are other examples that i rly don't see why the state need get involved, as long as no one else from the public is being hurt. [Of course, if successful in suicide, or a failure in a duel, there are no consequences for the perpetrator.]
I think the daughter/father thing is already being discussed on another forum.
But in short, i think exemptions exist for almost anything, provided there is consent. This is what allows MIA fighters to nearly kill one another without being charged with assault. [This by the way is a good counter point though - why is fighting in an arena for money, which is harmful to both people, increases medical expenditure, and promotes aggression in society an allowable free will choice, but if one of those individuals smokes a joint they face criminal charges?] So why not have personal exemptions for weed smokers that would address any public concerns before they could be granted an exemptions?
