Should submarines be able to take cities?

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Waffel, 01.07.2015 at 04:13

Napisano przez The Tactician, 01.07.2015 at 04:02

Napisano przez Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

Napisano przez Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

That's the point of the submarine, to sneak up on ppl liek HEY SURPRISE IT'S A NUCLEAR SUB GET FUCKED

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

Ikr? I think alot of people dont know Submarines have like rockets and stuff ;_;?

i was not being serious. i mean come on guys the "population" is referring to the population of cities in an online pc game, come on!, and if the three of you are gonna quote me you coulda used the same quote.

but on second read through this i am actually totally against subs taking towns cause stealthy subs taking towns is just op. even with mos or naval commander i would be skeptical of incorporating it. but i also dont think empty trans should not be able to take towns either.
i have a feeling only guys who only use gw or mos are really gunning for this to be implemented but in fairness my opinion is slightly bias as i find stealth in all forms kinda defeat the purpose of getting to fight people head on as when someone uses stealth, game dies, its just turns into a gun the cap game which is boring. really incredibly boring.

before the relentless bullshit statements come flying from defenders of stealth i have played alot of stealth myself and i won alot of games with stealth and they all bored the bejesus out of me so i stopped playing stealth because its crap, <In my opinion>

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Netre, 01.07.2015 at 15:46

Napisano przez Waffel, 01.07.2015 at 04:13

Napisano przez The Tactician, 01.07.2015 at 04:02

Napisano przez Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

Napisano przez Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

That's the point of the submarine, to sneak up on ppl liek HEY SURPRISE IT'S A NUCLEAR SUB GET FUCKED

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

Ikr? I think alot of people dont know Submarines have like rockets and stuff ;_;?

i was not being serious. i mean come on guys the "population" is referring to the population of cities in an online pc game, come on!, and if the three of you are gonna quote me you coulda used the same quote.

but on second read through this i am actually totally against subs taking towns cause stealthy subs taking towns is just op. even with mos or naval commander i would be skeptical of incorporating it. but i also dont think empty trans should not be able to take towns either.
i have a feeling only guys who only use gw or mos are really gunning for this to be implemented but in fairness my opinion is slightly bias as i find stealth in all forms kinda defeat the purpose of getting to fight people head on as when someone uses stealth, game dies, its just turns into a gun the cap game which is boring. really incredibly boring.

before the relentless bullshit statements come flying from defenders of stealth i have played alot of stealth myself and i won alot of games with stealth and they all bored the bejesus out of me so i stopped playing stealth because its crap, <In my opinion>

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Cytuj:

Napisano przez Netre, 01.07.2015 at 15:46

Napisano przez Waffel, 01.07.2015 at 04:13

Napisano przez The Tactician, 01.07.2015 at 04:02

Napisano przez Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

Napisano przez Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

That's the point of the submarine, to sneak up on ppl liek HEY SURPRISE IT'S A NUCLEAR SUB GET FUCKED

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

Ikr? I think alot of people dont know Submarines have like rockets and stuff ;_;?

i was not being serious. i mean come on guys the "population" is referring to the population of cities in an online pc game, come on!, and if the three of you are gonna quote me you coulda used the same quote.

but on second read through this i am actually totally against subs taking towns cause stealthy subs taking towns is just op. even with mos or naval commander i would be skeptical of incorporating it. but i also dont think empty trans should not be able to take towns either.
i have a feeling only guys who only use gw or mos are really gunning for this to be implemented but in fairness my opinion is slightly bias as i find stealth in all forms kinda defeat the purpose of getting to fight people head on as when someone uses stealth, game dies, its just turns into a gun the cap game which is boring. really incredibly boring.

before the relentless bullshit statements come flying from defenders of stealth i have played alot of stealth myself and i won alot of games with stealth and they all bored the bejesus out of me so i stopped playing stealth because its crap, <In my opinion>

That's quite a one dimensional way to look at stealth play, stealth is great for getting people to stack unneeded places, cause multi front wars or making opponent panic, not all about bam cap down..

Tbh no