XBOX VS PS3!!!!!!!!!!!!!

leave a gamertag or whatevs so i can play youuuu innns somethin

XBOX
support round eyed products

Xbox, it has security.

NEITHER.
See my wallpaper and make it your wallpaper too if you agree!

PC > PS3 > XBOX

Napisano przez Pinheiro, 13.07.2011 at 15:37

PC > PS3 > XBOX

PC=2 PS3s = 200XBOXes

Napisano przez Dream, 13.07.2011 at 16:05

PC=2 PS3s = 200XBOXes

I see a bit of bias in your utterly retarded statement. I'll have you know that the PS3 and the XBOX360 are actually pretty close to each other in terms of computing power.

PCs are many, many times superior to both which often goes unrecognised (!) but because they have to run a whole operating systems while running the games, they perform rather shortly of their true potential.

Still... these are 5-year old gaming consoles we are talking about which use hardware even older that that. Let it go already, they both suck by today's standards and for gaming in general to take a step forward, Sony and Microsoft need to cough up some money and move to the next generation already.

Napisano przez YOBA, 13.07.2011 at 16:42

Napisano przez Dream, 13.07.2011 at 16:05

PC=2 PS3s = 200XBOXes

I see a bit of bias in your utterly retarded statement. I'll have you know that the PS3 and the XBOX360 are actually pretty close to each other in terms of computing power.

PCs are many, many times superior to both which often goes unrecognised (!) but because they have to run a whole operating systems while running the games, they perform rather shortly of their true potential.

Still... these are 5-year old gaming consoles we are talking about which use hardware even older that that. Let it go already, they both suck by today's standards and for gaming in general to take a step forward, Sony and Microsoft need to cough up some money and move to the next generation already.

See, the problem with pc gaming, is that to get the same graphics as lets say an xbox, I need to pay 1000$ for a better graphics chip, then I have to 10 things, then buy a new sound chip, then 3 years later another 1000$ on a new graphics chip, and in 3 more years the pc dies. Waste of money in my oppinion when I could buy an xbox that comes with the shit already and it doesnt have to every little thing to run either. All in all, pcs are a dead gaming platform. Theres one platform that wasn't mentioned though that actually is the future of gaming- OnLive.

>the same graphics as lets say an xbox
NO. NOT THE SAME AT ALL! They can look way prettier, especially with mods for a huge assortment of games
>I need to pay 1000$ for a better graphics chip, then I have to 10 things, then buy a new sound chip, then 3 years later another 1000$ on a new graphics chip
Oh come on. $1000? Zimbabwean dollars, perhaps. High-end graphics cards cost no more than $300 tops. And we're talking about optimised graphics cards here. Plus, a high-end card you would buy today would keep you playing the games of the next 5 years probably on the high setting.

And seriously, you are trolling so hard. Why would you consider replacing a sound chip? Not that it would cost anywhere near $1000 either.
>and in 3 more years the pc dies.
6 years in total then? Yeah, if you buy a laptop, perhaps, or a PC outfitted with "tweaked" AMD hardware.
>Theres one platform that wasn't mentioned though that actually is the future of gaming- OnLive.
Haha, definitely trolling there. But yeah, it is a possibility in the future. But I'm not going to pay US$19 a month simply to play games I have to purchase anyway even if they are single player only. Ridiculous.

Napisano przez YOBA, 13.07.2011 at 18:14

>the same graphics as lets say an xbox
NO. NOT THE SAME AT ALL! They can look way prettier, especially with mods for a huge assortment of games
>I need to pay 1000$ for a better graphics chip, then I have to 10 things, then buy a new sound chip, then 3 years later another 1000$ on a new graphics chip
Oh come on. $1000? Zimbabwean dollars, perhaps. High-end graphics cards cost no more than $300 tops. And we're talking about optimised graphics cards here. Plus, a high-end card you would buy today would keep you playing the games of the next 5 years probably on the high setting.

And seriously, you are trolling so hard. Why would you consider replacing a sound chip? Not that it would cost anywhere near $1000 either.
>and in 3 more years the pc dies.
6 years in total then? Yeah, if you buy a laptop, perhaps, or a PC outfitted with "tweaked" AMD hardware.
>Theres one platform that wasn't mentioned though that actually is the future of gaming- OnLive.
Haha, definitely trolling there. But yeah, it is a possibility in the future. But I'm not going to pay US$19 a month simply to play games I have to purchase anyway even if they are single player only. Ridiculous.

I think your mad.

Napisano przez Garde, 13.07.2011 at 18:59

I think your mad.

Not really. I think you're just a lame troll who won't take anything seriously. I'm trying to teach you a few things here. Also, a graphics card with only the chipset is useless. In fact, it would render it unusable with modern interfaces for graphics devices. Enough said.

Utterly retarded?

Seems so
Usuall holywar began.
Someone should really create a vote on

Gardevoir or YOBA

ΥΟΒΑ knows what he is on about and can spell.

Napisano przez Aristosseur, 14.07.2011 at 04:39

ΥΟΒΑ knows what he is on about and can spell.

Napisano przez Garde, 13.07.2011 at 17:37

Napisano przez YOBA, 13.07.2011 at 16:42

Napisano przez Dream, 13.07.2011 at 16:05

PC=2 PS3s = 200XBOXes

I see a bit of bias in your utterly retarded statement. I'll have you know that the PS3 and the XBOX360 are actually pretty close to each other in terms of computing power.

PCs are many, many times superior to both which often goes unrecognised (!) but because they have to run a whole operating systems while running the games, they perform rather shortly of their true potential.

Still... these are 5-year old gaming consoles we are talking about which use hardware even older that that. Let it go already, they both suck by today's standards and for gaming in general to take a step forward, Sony and Microsoft need to cough up some money and move to the next generation already.

See, the problem with pc gaming, is that to get the same graphics as lets say an xbox, I need to pay 1000$ for a better graphics chip, then I have to 10 things, then buy a new sound chip, then 3 years later another 1000$ on a new graphics chip, and in 3 more years the pc dies. Waste of money in my oppinion when I could buy an xbox that comes with the shit already and it doesnt have to every little thing to run either. All in all, pcs are a dead gaming platform. Theres one platform that wasn't mentioned though that actually is the future of gaming- OnLive.

applefag spotted.

Napisano przez BASED Ironail, 14.07.2011 at 08:22

Napisano przez Garde, 13.07.2011 at 17:37

Napisano przez YOBA, 13.07.2011 at 16:42

Napisano przez Dream, 13.07.2011 at 16:05

PC=2 PS3s = 200XBOXes

I see a bit of bias in your utterly retarded statement. I'll have you know that the PS3 and the XBOX360 are actually pretty close to each other in terms of computing power.

PCs are many, many times superior to both which often goes unrecognised (!) but because they have to run a whole operating systems while running the games, they perform rather shortly of their true potential.

Still... these are 5-year old gaming consoles we are talking about which use hardware even older that that. Let it go already, they both suck by today's standards and for gaming in general to take a step forward, Sony and Microsoft need to cough up some money and move to the next generation already.

See, the problem with pc gaming, is that to get the same graphics as lets say an xbox, I need to pay 1000$ for a better graphics chip, then I have to 10 things, then buy a new sound chip, then 3 years later another 1000$ on a new graphics chip, and in 3 more years the pc dies. Waste of money in my oppinion when I could buy an xbox that comes with the shit already and it doesnt have to every little thing to run either. All in all, pcs are a dead gaming platform. Theres one platform that wasn't mentioned though that actually is the future of gaming- OnLive.

applefag spotted.

>Implying I like apple when I already voted and commented on xbox.

Retard spotted.

Hehe. applefag

>Implying apples are really bundles of sticks OR
>Implying apples are gay OR
>Implying people that like apple are stupid in that way

Lol i dont have either an xbox or ps3 so i vote for wii cos thats what i do have but its dying

Napisano przez Cardinal, 14.07.2011 at 00:19

Seems so
Usuall holywar began.
Someone should really create a vote on

Gardevoir or YOBA

lol I would, but Gard would get mad and probably delete my account...

Who is the dumb ass who says the PC is better? PS3 I like better but I believe XBOX may be the same.

Wii is the worst. It's terrible compared to PS3 and XBOX

Who is the dumb ass who says the PS3 is better? XBOX I like better but I believe PC may be the same.

Useless thread full with friendly fanboys.

NO, friendly APPLE PRODUCTS ARE AWESOME! I EVEN BOUGHT A friendly DILDO WITH THE friendly APPLE LOGO ON IT. X---------DDDD


NO, MICROSOFT IS BETTER ! I EVEN BOUGHT A friendly DILDO THAT RUNS WITH THE friendly WINDOWS OS. X-------DDDDDDDDDD


This is what I read on this friendly thread, friendly fanboys being friendly fanboys.

I have a friendly Xbox 360 and I played on a friendly PS3 lots of times in my friendly friend's house. friendly Shit's the same.


Oh and I have a High tech PC. I prefer friendly PC's since the friendly gaming is much more hardcore friendly.

Wii is better

NINTENDO 64 STRONG

GAMEBOY COLOUR STRONG. I USED TO PLAY POKEMON ON THAT SHIT.

All caps ftw

Edit: he's gonna ban you again

How come? I only expressed my feelings through simple analogies.

BRB GOING TO EDIT THAT SHIT WITH "FRIENDLY" THINGS.

Done he can't do nothing now and even if he does I have the print where ivan says that you can be offensive while being friendly.