New strategies?

I like the 1234567 sp required lol.

About time!!!

+2 def for walling units seems a bit useless.

Napisano przez Nations, 30.03.2016 at 15:09

+2 def for walling units seems a bit useless.

It is indeed.

Napisano przez clovis1122, 30.03.2016 at 10:57

Napisano przez 12gsh, 30.03.2016 at 10:52

Oh yeah, I failed to mention that 2 new strats might be coming as well: Scorched Earth and Hold the Line (though many of you have already known this)

Just checked Hold the line....

.... I wont be using that strategy unless WF is made harder to the opponent, or, if at least 2 units from the walling stack survives the wall is being kept.

... Otherwise you can just send one unit to break the wall... and that -1 defense in cities hurts considering that you want to hold rich cities like Moscow...

Well its obvious these 2 strats are still being tested.Lets see how both of them will involve.However I dont like the idea a certain strategy to unlock a missile or I dont want missiles in game because any noob will just spam missiles with op attack.No skill required at all.

Napisano przez Nations, 30.03.2016 at 15:16

Well its obvious these 2 strats are still being tested.Lets see how both of them will involve.However I dont like the idea a certain strategy to unlock a missile or I dont want missiles in game because any noob will just spam missiles with op attack.No skill required at all.

dont worry this would only happen in noob world 50k...

Napisano przez Kraigg, 30.03.2016 at 16:33

Napisano przez Nations, 30.03.2016 at 15:16

Well its obvious these 2 strats are still being tested.Lets see how both of them will involve.However I dont like the idea a certain strategy to unlock a missile or I dont want missiles in game because any noob will just spam missiles with op attack.No skill required at all.

dont worry this would only happen in noob world 50k...

attack is the best defence bro

Maybe they will make it so that in order to break the walls of a player with the hold the line strategy, you have to kill the units that make up the walls?

Scorch earth.... looks weak what the benefit?

In other news, a new unit???

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

Napisano przez Nations, 30.03.2016 at 15:09

+2 def for walling units seems a bit useless.

not at all, its quite usefull in scenarios where there is a lot of walling

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 30.03.2016 at 23:00

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

HP: 1 , Cost 700$, ie at best u roll a 20 and kill 2 units, then the missile dies... Useless

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

While I kind of agree with you, it's a bit too early to be calling them shit. instead of writing off the "rebel" strat they could have revised to make it competitive and not OP, but we don't actually know what they're thinking with these new strats, it's all speculation and they could be good. Let's test them first... that means waiting for their official release.

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 04:01

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 30.03.2016 at 23:00

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

HP: 1 , Cost 700$, ie at best u roll a 20 and kill 2 units, then the missile dies... Useless

It's not available yet, which means it's not finished. Stop complaining

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 07:18

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 04:01

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 30.03.2016 at 23:00

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

HP: 1 , Cost 700$, ie at best u roll a 20 and kill 2 units, then the missile dies... Useless

It's not available yet, which means it's not finished. Stop complaining

Dude I m just stating a fact: from what we see, no point in complaining about the missile cause no one will ever use it...

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 07:19

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 07:18

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 04:01

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 30.03.2016 at 23:00

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

HP: 1 , Cost 700$, ie at best u roll a 20 and kill 2 units, then the missile dies... Useless

It's not available yet, which means it's not finished. Stop complaining

Dude I m just stating a fact: from what we see, no point in complaining about the missile cause no one will ever use it...

the 250 collateral stat is missing on that list....

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 07:19

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 07:18

Napisano przez Kraigg, 31.03.2016 at 04:01

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 30.03.2016 at 23:00

Napisano przez Dereny, 30.03.2016 at 18:53

In other news, a new unit???

Is this the beginning of the end of the classic 3v3's? lol, i'll test that as soon as possible.

HP: 1 , Cost 700$, ie at best u roll a 20 and kill 2 units, then the missile dies... Useless

It's not available yet, which means it's not finished. Stop complaining

Dude I m just stating a fact: from what we see, no point in complaining about the missile cause no one will ever use it...

Maybe not the default stats, but with scorched earth strat it might become viable

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

They've not been released at all. It's still incomplete and we're probably able to see them only because of a coding mistake.

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 09:00

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

They've not been released at all. It's still incomplete and we're probably able to see them only because of a coding mistake.

It's not a coding mistake.

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 11:18

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 09:00

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

They've not been released at all. It's still incomplete and we're probably able to see them only because of a coding mistake.

It's not a coding mistake.

Okay then. I'm sorry. But my knowledge of computers is mostly 'Power on. Wait. Sign in to atWar. Play like noob. Log out. Shut down'
Shouldn't make assumptions I guess. My bad.

EDIT: I forgot to write 'Pray to Zizou'

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 12:55

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 11:18

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 09:00

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

They've not been released at all. It's still incomplete and we're probably able to see them only because of a coding mistake.

It's not a coding mistake.

Okay then. I'm sorry. But my knowledge of computers is mostly 'Power on. Wait. Sign in to atWar. Play like noob. Log out. Shut down'
Shouldn't make assumptions I guess. My bad.

EDIT: I forgot to write 'Pray to Zizou'

Didnt mean anything by it, just letting you know.

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 13:00

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 12:55

Napisano przez Phoenix, 31.03.2016 at 11:18

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 09:00

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 06:48

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 03:17

Napisano przez Dragon, 31.03.2016 at 00:29

Instead of considering Cthulhu's "Rebel Strategy" the community welcomed, they made two basically useless strategies

Ivan made a good point. It was just an OP version of GW. And considering GW is already considered by its players to be OP...On the Rebel Strategy forum too it was acknowledged to be a 'Super' GW.

So the better solution is to make two even shitter strats with no practical value or community support? lol

They've not been released at all. It's still incomplete and we're probably able to see them only because of a coding mistake.

It's not a coding mistake.

Okay then. I'm sorry. But my knowledge of computers is mostly 'Power on. Wait. Sign in to atWar. Play like noob. Log out. Shut down'
Shouldn't make assumptions I guess. My bad.

EDIT: I forgot to write 'Pray to Zizou'

Didnt mean anything by it, just letting you know.

It's appreciated. Thank you

The REBEL stategy is very poorly balanced more powerful version of GW.

What we need is more diverse strategies.
Right now all strategies either buff militia or dont affect them at all.

Why not do something new like have a strat that nerfs militia like I suggested a while back. Even blitz militia is buffed by range which is much better than losing 1 def. There is no strat that debuffs militia in any significant way.

Also mini rant

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 12:55

Okay then. I'm sorry. But my knowledge of computers is mostly 'Power on. Wait. Sign in to atWar. Play like noob. Log out. Shut down'
Shouldn't make assumptions I guess. My bad.

Stop spamming the forum with fluff to inflate your post count

Napisano przez ROYAL, 31.03.2016 at 13:04

The REBEL stategy is very poorly balanced more powerful version of GW.

What we need is more diverse strategies.
Right now all strategies either buff militia or dont affect them at all.

Why not do something new like have a strat that nerfs militia like I suggested a while back. Even blitz militia is buffed by range which is much better than losing 1 def. There is no strat that debuffs militia in any significant way.

Also mini rant

Napisano przez Darth., 31.03.2016 at 12:55

Okay then. I'm sorry. But my knowledge of computers is mostly 'Power on. Wait. Sign in to atWar. Play like noob. Log out. Shut down'
Shouldn't make assumptions I guess. My bad.

Stop spamming the forum with fluff to inflate your post count

WTF. I was apologizing. If you like next time I'll just say a one word sorry.
FYI I don't give a crap about my post count. I enjoy this game, and I enjoy surfing the forums. If you have a problem, too bad. Deal with it. I'm not letting people like you spoil atWar for me.