How france should react in your opinion?

Napisano przez Laozi, 14.11.2015 at 21:00

Napisano przez Guest, 14.11.2015 at 15:53

Dude....The nazi symbol was stolen from Hindu religion...."bent over cross"

I believe it wasn't taken from there despite its similarity with the hindu sign.
In his childhood, Hitler attended school in an old Catholic monastery, there he saw this unique symbol of a cross at the top of its front entry everyday.
He admired the way it look, and when the nazi organization were looking for a symbol, he knew what to choose.
It accompanied him for the rest of his life as the nazi swastika.

The nazi party was around before Hitler joined, so was the symbol.

Napisano przez Helly, 15.11.2015 at 01:19

The nazi party was around before Hitler joined, so was the symbol.

it was very small and meaningless party, in the assembly he was sent to spy on there have been only 12 people no?

#StopYulinFrance2015.

Napisano przez Dereny, 14.11.2015 at 12:24

Oh no cartoons the next weapon of mass destruction!!

Real life have no limits like the internet. You are responisble for your actions in real life and there are no mods to protect you and ban your enemy. Charle Hebdo had responsibility for their actions and action triggers reaction.

Everything you do in your life have repercussions, that's why teach our children to think before act. First jump then say geronimo.

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 14.11.2015 at 19:38

Napisano przez Viruslegion, 14.11.2015 at 13:50

Napisano przez Ghostface, 14.11.2015 at 13:42

Napisano przez Lemonade, 14.11.2015 at 13:28

You guys are right, not all muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are muslims

Yes because Christians tend to not blow themselves up for just a few victims but systematically kill 6 million.
Its all from what POV you see it

Hitler was atheist, not Christian, and had a growing admiration for the Islamic faith throughout his life

Hitler created the Kirchensteuer ("tax for church") that transferred (and transfers) millions of Deutsche Mark (Euros nowadays) to the catholic and protestant church. Very atheist.

I fail to see how that means he can't be atheist, Hitler had to act like a Christian so people would buy the propaganda he put out using the Teutonic Knights and Holy Roman Empire, if a leader is openly atheist and fights the church it's hard to buy his propaganda about a sacred Germany. Your also ignoring that Hitler said his largest opponent in Germany was the Catholic church.

Napisano przez Helly, 15.11.2015 at 01:19

Napisano przez Laozi, 14.11.2015 at 21:00

Napisano przez Guest, 14.11.2015 at 15:53

Dude....The nazi symbol was stolen from Hindu religion...."bent over cross"

I believe it wasn't taken from there despite its similarity with the hindu sign.
In his childhood, Hitler attended school in an old Catholic monastery, there he saw this unique symbol of a cross at the top of its front entry everyday.
He admired the way it look, and when the nazi organization were looking for a symbol, he knew what to choose.
It accompanied him for the rest of his life as the nazi swastika.

The nazi party was around before Hitler joined, so was the symbol.

That is right, the nazi organization existed several years before Adolf Hitler joined.
The swastika was also adopted by number of far right nationalist movements after world war 1.
As a symbol, it became associated with the idea of a racially pure state.
The connotations of the swastika had forever changed, after the nazi's party gained power in Germany.

It was Hitler who choose the party's flag. In meine kampf Hitler wrote: "I myself, meanwhile, after innumerable attempts, had laid down a final form; a flag with a red background, a white disk, and a black swastika in the middle. After long trials I also found a definite proportion between the size of the flag and the size of the white disk, as well as the shape and thickness of the swastika."
https://goo.gl/NxIzec You can read more from this link if you are interested in this section

Hitler was a roman catholic, he writes in Mein Kampf that he felt his actions were sanctioned by god. And sure there are consequences to your actions in real life, but they should be appropiate. Laugh about a historical figure, get killed, WTF? Maximal over reaction. They will learn that the more they do, the more they attack europe, they will be driving themself and all muslims in a corner. Wait till France recovers from the shock of that attack, it's going to be the european 9/11. Despite the jokes about France giving up and all, they have a decent military, so be prepared ISIS. Oh and it is not going to be a nice place for muslims in europe soon.

Napisano przez Guest, 16.11.2015 at 02:21

Hitler was a roman catholic,

This. Hitler was baptized and he never renounced.

Napisano przez Hugosch, 16.11.2015 at 04:17

Napisano przez Guest, 16.11.2015 at 02:21

Hitler was a roman catholic,

This. Hitler was baptized and he never renounced.

here is a guy we hav'nt seen a while

Napisano przez Guest, 16.11.2015 at 02:21

Hitler was a roman catholic, he writes in Mein Kampf that he felt his actions were sanctioned by god. And sure there are consequences to your actions in real life, but they should be appropiate. Laugh about a historical figure, get killed, WTF? Maximal over reaction. They will learn that the more they do, the more they attack europe, they will be driving themself and all muslims in a corner. Wait till France recovers from the shock of that attack, it's going to be the european 9/11. Despite the jokes about France giving up and all, they have a decent military, so be prepared ISIS. Oh and it is not going to be a nice place for muslims in europe soon.

france has the strongest military in europe, the soldiers must be full motivated to fight and they have foreigns legion that they would'nt mind to sent into hard battles, france can crush ISIS army very easily, it's only about if the government wants to fight/thinks fighting will play for their favour.

personally i don't see how destorying isis would help, at the moment the war is over a new organistion will show up, and i don't think nato would like to stay there again.

Napisano przez Rock Lee, 16.11.2015 at 05:38

france has the strongest military in europe

Wikipedia says 40% of Europe is in Russia so i have to correct you there and say that Russia have the strongest military in Europe

But again, Russian Army is stronger than all other militaries combined, so this was redundant :/

Stupid people who keeps on denying the fact that Hitler was a fervent Christian.

Napisano przez Yeomanry, 16.11.2015 at 07:29

Stupid people who keeps on denying the fact that Hitler was a fervent Christian.

See that's because people have no real bad example of atheists who murder and slaughter all before them, so they keep claiming that certain historical figures, which were maybe religious, but certainly no atheists, were atheists, to have someone they can point to and say " Look at this horrible atheist and all the jewes he killed". At the same time it is completely disregarded that any nation on this earth so far had had some hand in one atrocity or another. To name a few, Turkey and the armenian genocide, England and the exploitation of africa for slaves, Americans and their genocide of the native americans, Germany and the Jewes of course and so on and so on. My point is these are all horrible things but people like to ignore all genocides but the one commited on the jewes ( which probably was the most successful and streamlind one to date I admit) and they want that one to be committed by an atheist. Christian fundamentallist propaganda.

Thus for the first time a high inner purpose
is accredited to the State. In face of the ridiculous
phrase that the State should do no more

Page 1167

VOLUME II CHAPTER II
than act as the guardian of public order and
tranquillity, so that everybody can peacefully
dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the
highest type of humanity which a beneficent
Creator has bestowed on this earth.

Page 1168
from Mein Kampf, just to give you an idea what language he used.

Lol went completely offtopic though o_o, sry about that

No destroying Isis in itself won't do anything, as we have seen with al-Qaeda, try to destroy al-Qaeda, ISIS pops up.
The problem is Islam itself, because if you accept that Mohammed was the prohet of Allah, you have to accept that the Qur'an is the word of god.
If you do that you will have to take the Qur'an literally and if you do that, you behave like people from ISIS or al-Qaeda. The Que'an dictates very precicely how to live your life. How to dress, what to eat, when to pray etc, etc. Islam is not just a religion, it is a totalitarian guide on how to life all the aspects of your life. That also includes how to deal with infidels or kuffars and that is exactely how Mohammed did it, kill them all if they don't convert.

France should reinstate the House of Bonaparte. They should crown either Charles Napoleon or Jean-Christophe Napoleon as the Emperor. They would have a harsh response towards ISIS due to the legacy of their ancestor Napoleon Bonaparte. The House of Bonaparte is perfect for France.

I urge France to show restraint and not attack the peaceful citizens of of Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc, with fighter jets or drones, and divide Paris to the satisfaction of the muslim residents, and I call on European countries as a sign of solidarity to do the same thing.
Peace is in the doorway and I hope that the French government and its people aren't going to put roadblocks in hostile Muslim neighborhoods or revoke the citizenship of its radical Muslim or Arab citizens, because that will be considered an apartheid, and abuse against the rights of these poor freedom fighters.

Napisano przez Joseph1, 16.11.2015 at 22:26

France should reinstate the House of Bonaparte. They should crown either Charles Napoleon or Jean-Christophe Napoleon as the Emperor. They would have a harsh response towards ISIS due to the legacy of their ancestor Napoleon Bonaparte. The House of Bonaparte is perfect for France.

Until economy collapse and french people decapitate their monarch

Napisano przez Abraham, 18.11.2015 at 12:02

I urge France to show restraint and not attack the peaceful citizens of of Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc, with fighter jets or drones, and divide Paris to the satisfaction of the muslim residents, and I call on European countries as a sign of solidarity to do the same thing.
Peace is in the doorway and I hope that the French government and its people aren't going to put roadblocks in hostile Muslim neighborhoods or revoke the citizenship of its radical Muslim or Arab citizens, because that will be considered an apartheid, and abuse against the rights of these poor freedom fighters.

its ironic how a jew is trying to be ironic in this comment

ISIS is to Islam; KKK is to Christianity.

Napisano przez Yeomanry, 18.11.2015 at 19:45

ISIS is to Islam; KKK is to Christianity.

ISIS is to Islam as KKK is to Protestantism, an accurate representation

Napisano przez Viruslegion, 19.11.2015 at 12:44

Napisano przez Yeomanry, 18.11.2015 at 19:45

ISIS is to Islam; KKK is to Christianity.

ISIS is to Islam as KKK is to Protestantism, an accurate representation

Protestants are still Christian, duh

Napisano przez Yeomanry, 19.11.2015 at 19:14

Napisano przez Viruslegion, 19.11.2015 at 12:44

Napisano przez Yeomanry, 18.11.2015 at 19:45

ISIS is to Islam; KKK is to Christianity.

ISIS is to Islam as KKK is to Protestantism, an accurate representation

Protestants are still Christian, duh

yes, but lumping them together with Catholics and Orthodox would be silly

Napisano przez Viruslegion, 19.11.2015 at 19:42

yes, but lumping them together with Catholics and Orthodox would be silly

Considering that people here seem to have no qualms lumping followers of Sunni, Shia, and Sufi Islam as simply "Muslim," I fail to see why making fine distinctions in Christianity is necessary.