Climate change future predictions

We all know climate change is a fact. By the end of the century some places will get 3-5 degrees warmer.
A lot of places will get disruptive and a mass migration will take place.
Now how will climate change affect the balance of power in the world?

I looked at what a 3-5 degrees change will mean to countries, which regions will benefit from it, and how they will change the balance of power.
As we all know, human productivity is at its highest at an annual average temperature of 11 - 15 degrees C.
So when we take into account the 3 - 5 degrees change, it would mean that everything below canada, nordic countries, and siberia will hugely suffer. And that these three regions will vastly benefit from climate change. Why? because these countries annual average temperature will be at around 11 -15 degrees.
My prediction is that these regions will become the new superpowers of the 22st centuries.
Why?
Its land will be arable. Ice will melt > more land. Efficient agriculture possible. And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.
With more arable land and more efficient food production would mean that these regions have place for more people. Since rich white people dont make a lot of people, the only way to use the arable land is by immigration.
This goes hand in hand with the problems the southern hemisphere will have > less water , less arable land, less resources due to climate change.
A mass migration will take place from the southern hemisphere to the northern. This in turn will change the appearances of these three regions. Russians will become vastly outnumbered and in turn majority of people in russia will more or less look like asians/ turkic people. Canada and the nordic countries will face the same fate.
Russias population will slowly decrease this century until a breaking point and in the 22st century it will in turn increase to like 300-400 million inhabitants. Mainly due to immigration.

This is of course, with all things being equal. So no major wars happen. (highly unlikely)

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

We all know climate change is a fact. By the end of the century some places will get 3-5 degrees warmer.
A lot of places will get disruptive and a mass migration will take place.
Now how will climate change affect the balance of power in the world?

I looked at what a 3-5 degrees change will mean to countries, which regions will benefit from it, and how they will change the balance of power.
As we all know, human productivity is at its highest at an annual average temperature of 11 - 15 degrees C.
So when we take into account the 3 - 5 degrees change, it would mean that everything below canada, nordic countries, and siberia will hugely suffer. And that these three regions will vastly benefit from climate change. Why? because these countries annual average temperature will be at around 11 -15 degrees.
My prediction is that these regions will become the new superpowers of the 22st centuries.
Why?
Its land will be arable. Ice will melt > more land. Efficient agriculture possible. And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.
With more arable land and more efficient food production would mean that these regions have place for more people. Since rich white people dont make a lot of people, the only way to use the arable land is by immigration.
This goes hand in hand with the problems the southern hemisphere will have > less water , less arable land, less resources due to climate change.
A mass migration will take place from the southern hemisphere to the northern. This in turn will change the appearances of these three regions. Russians will become vastly outnumbered and in turn majority of people in russia will more or less look like asians/ turkic people. Canada and the nordic countries will face the same fate.
Russias population will slowly decrease this century until a breaking point and in the 22st century it will in turn increase to like 300-400 million inhabitants. Mainly due to immigration.

This is of course, with all things being equal. So no major wars happen. (highly unlikely)

you have a point. but we have been accustomed to the heats long enough that it has started to not bother us. but that causes a migrant influx into northern countries in search of better climates to live in. this global warming is also bad, cause it increases th risk of fires on dry wood, burning more and more forests which may cause lack of oxygen.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

Bla...climate change...bla

Lol, can't believe u think climate change is real. In fact, the sun is decreasing activity and we're heading to a cooler climate...

Napisano przez I_Hate_You_All, 17.06.2021 at 14:43

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

Bla...climate change...bla

Lol, can't believe u think climate change is real. In fact, the sun is decreasing activity and we're heading to a cooler climate...

Science is against you. Climate change is a fact, not an opinion. We dont care if you have an opinion. Facts however cannot be denied. We can literally measure the climate and its averages. We can look to the artic and see if the ice is melting or if the there is more ice.
If you wanna know how ice melts. Go to ur ice fridge, take some ice cubes and put one in the sun and one in the fridge, and see which one melts faster.
This isnt some rocket science. Anyone with decent human thinking capacity can understand what can be measured and is factual.

Napisano przez comradestalin69, 17.06.2021 at 11:19

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

The sahara will enlarge itself. This will mean that in this century alone, like 500 million people have to migrate from their own lands. Lack of water, food etc will force them to migrate.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 18.06.2021 at 10:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

he will be long dead.... im talking about 2150-2200, maybe even after.
Today, russia is very weak. Only thing it excels is militarily, but even other countries are on par if not stronger. Economically russia is far behind. No leverage whatsoever.
But 2150-2200 will be very different, thanks to climate change.

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 18.06.2021 at 10:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

i fear for that day.

Napisano przez comradestalin69, 19.06.2021 at 05:36

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 18.06.2021 at 10:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

i fear for that day.

russia in 2200 will be completely different from today, in every aspect.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 19.06.2021 at 09:55

Napisano przez comradestalin69, 19.06.2021 at 05:36

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 18.06.2021 at 10:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

i fear for that day.

russia in 2200 will be completely different from today, in every aspect.

Russian Empire or Nuclear War?

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 19.06.2021 at 11:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 19.06.2021 at 09:55

Napisano przez comradestalin69, 19.06.2021 at 05:36

Napisano przez Fatcheek, 18.06.2021 at 10:09

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 17.06.2021 at 07:56

And most of all, sea transport through the artic will be possible. No more need for Panama canal, or Suez canal. From Beijing- artic - London would take 1/3 less time to transport than Beijng - Suez - London.
So economically wise, they will vastly benefit from trade. Furthermore, access to resources such as oil, gas, minerals will give them a huge boost. All siberia, canada, norway etc have a lot of resources, with the ice melting these will become accessable.

Guess Russia is gonna be a superpower. Andartes will be in his chair saying "I told you so".

i fear for that day.

russia in 2200 will be completely different from today, in every aspect.

Russian Empire or Nuclear War?

Its people. The average russian is now more or less caucanoid. In 2200 that will not be the case.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 08:58

Its people. The average russian is now more or less caucanoid. In 2200 that will not be the case.

Russia has the cleanest slav genome in Europe and Worldwide (around 42% average r1a).

Now let's talk a bit about your nazi race theory. Caucasoid (not caucanoid) is one of the three basic ethnic group of people.

According to the historical race classifications of the modern era (18th-19th centuries), the basic concept was that there are white people (Europid = Caucasoid), black people (Negroid) and yellow people (Mongoloid). This has been established in the late 1700's (see Göttingen).

Later as delighted europeans were discovering further lands and humans, Blumenbach and Meiners added color terminology for race, such as brown people (Malayan), red people (Native Americans).

Then Gatterer, Schlözer and Eichhorn expanded this with biblical terminology: the jews (Semitic), the north africans (Hamatic) and the caucasians (Japhaetic).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6ttingen_school_of_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Friedrich_Blumenbach

Can you tell me what do you mean by "Russia will be caucanoid"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartvelian_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Caucasian_languages

I was about to get multiple sources to prove you wrong but I was lazy and wikipedia seemed to have abundant information for this purpose.

Anyway, race studies itself and Göttingen school of history is heavily denounced and banned in many countries nowadays. The reason for this is very simple. As you may know by now, anti-semitism (Nazi Germany, Holocaust), anti-hamatism (Roman Empire, Carthaginian genocide), anti-japhetism (Armenian, Georgian, and several other genocides), or just simply calling someone "negroid" or "mongoloid" (or the more offensive version of these, n word in europe and america, m word in asia), and the race theories in general highly became offensive.

So after all, did you mean that the 1,5 - 4% kartvelian DNA (called caucanoid by you, I guess you referred to Caucasian people) will take over the superior 75-90% russian CAUCASOID descendants in Russia?

Am I feeling right that you are sharing ultranationalist views here on forum that kids and teenagers might see?

What you are trying to prove here is basically the same as what Hitler told about the semitic people.
https://conworld.fandom.com/wiki/Antijaphetism

Napisano przez Daisy91old, 27.06.2021 at 15:59

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 08:58

Its people. The average russian is now more or less caucanoid. In 2200 that will not be the case.

Russia has the cleanest slav genome in Europe and Worldwide (around 42% average r1a).

Now let's talk a bit about your nazi race theory. Caucasoid (not caucanoid) is one of the three basic ethnic group of people.

According to the historical race classifications of the modern era (18th-19th centuries), the basic concept was that there are white people (Europid = Caucasoid), black people (Negroid) and yellow people (Mongoloid). This has been established in the late 1700's (see Göttingen).

Later as delighted europeans were discovering further lands and humans, Blumenbach and Meiners added color terminology for race, such as brown people (Malayan), red people (Native Americans).

Then Gatterer, Schlözer and Eichhorn expanded this with biblical terminology: the jews (Semitic), the north africans (Hamatic) and the caucasians (Japhaetic).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6ttingen_school_of_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Friedrich_Blumenbach

Can you tell me what do you mean by "Russia will be caucanoid"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartvelian_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Caucasian_languages

I was about to get multiple sources to prove you wrong but I was lazy and wikipedia seemed to have abundant information for this purpose.

Anyway, race studies itself and Göttingen school of history is heavily denounced and banned in many countries nowadays. The reason for this is very simple. As you may know by now, anti-semitism (Nazi Germany, Holocaust), anti-hamatism (Roman Empire, Carthaginian genocide), anti-japhetism (Armenian, Georgian, and several other genocides), or just simply calling someone "negroid" or "mongoloid" (or the more offensive version of these, n word in europe and america, m word in asia), and the race theories in general highly became offensive.

So after all, did you mean that the 1,5 - 4% kartvelian DNA (called caucanoid by you, I guess you referred to Caucasian people) will take over the superior 75-90% russian CAUCASOID descendants in Russia?

Am I feeling right that you are sharing ultranationalist views here on forum that kids and teenagers might see?

What you are trying to prove here is basically the same as what Hitler told about the semitic people.
https://conworld.fandom.com/wiki/Antijaphetism

Dafuk are u drinking. Read my opening post and u wouldnt embaress urself doctrezz dizzy.
If u had read, u would know that due to mass migration, the appearance of russians, i.e. any northern society will change. So idk where the fuck you come up with your nonsense.
Basic post is about climate change and how it will influence these regions. If i go by the consensus, the earth will warm up.

Now apologize with your fascist shit post and read the opening post again.
The days of ideology and race bashing is over. This isnt the 20th century anymore. Doctrezz dizzy. Stop drinking wodka.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 16:22

Dafuk are u drinking. Read my opening post and u wouldnt embaress urself doctrezz dizzy.
If u had read, u would know that due to mass migration, the appearance of russians, i.e. any northern society will change. So idk where the fuck you come up with your nonsense.
Basic post is about climate change and how it will influence these regions. If i go by the consensus, the earth will warm up.

Now apologize with your fascist shit post and read the opening post again.
The days of ideology and race bashing is over. This isnt the 20th century anymore. Doctrezz dizzy. Stop drinking wodka.

The term "caucanoid" you used was wrong as I pointed it out. Therefore I still don't understand how this is related at all to climate change. It's just plain racism. Even if you don't call yourself a racist, you fulfill the definition. Yet you call me fascist. Great job.

Napisano przez Daisy91old, 27.06.2021 at 16:47

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 16:22

Dafuk are u drinking. Read my opening post and u wouldnt embaress urself doctrezz dizzy.
If u had read, u would know that due to mass migration, the appearance of russians, i.e. any northern society will change. So idk where the fuck you come up with your nonsense.
Basic post is about climate change and how it will influence these regions. If i go by the consensus, the earth will warm up.

Now apologize with your fascist shit post and read the opening post again.
The days of ideology and race bashing is over. This isnt the 20th century anymore. Doctrezz dizzy. Stop drinking wodka.

The term "caucanoid" you used was wrong as I pointed it out. Therefore I still don't understand how this is related at all to climate change.

Yeah, i spelled it wrong. It is caucasoid, thank you for pointing it out and writing a whole damn essay about it.
Ok now about climate change.
The consensus is : earth will warm up, lets just both agree on this, doesnt matter if u urself disagree.
If the earth warms up, regions will change, such us unhabitable land like siberia will now be habitable. Its lands become arable.
Due to climate change, other regions will hugely suffer. Most of these regions are now populated by immense amount of people. These people will migrate, it always happens.
Secondly, rich people tend to get fewer children than poor people. This is due to a lot of factors, but mainly education, benefits, health, women who go study and make career wont have time to bear a child etc. Russian population already is shrinking, it already has 11 million migrants, not all ofcourse from asia. The point here however is, when land becomes economically suitable, but there isnt enough people, u will get people from somewhere else. Countries in eastern europe have the same problem as Russia, so u wont get millions from eastern europe. So it becomes obvious that the migration will take place from central/ south/ south-east asia into russia.

Note. that this is without any wars/ major pandemic setback, nuclear armagadon or whatever.

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 16:58

Yeah, i spelled it wrong. It is caucasoid, thank you for pointing it out and writing a whole damn essay about it.
Ok now about climate change.
The consensus is : earth will warm up, lets just both agree on this, doesnt matter if u urself disagree.
If the earth warms up, regions will change, such us unhabitable land like siberia will now be habitable. Its lands become arable.
Due to climate change, other regions will hugely suffer. Most of these regions are now populated by immense amount of people. These people will migrate, it always happens.
Secondly, rich people tend to get fewer children than poor people. This is due to a lot of factors, but mainly education, benefits, health, women who go study and make career wont have time to bear a child etc. Russian population already is shrinking, it already has 11 million migrants, not all ofcourse from asia. The point here however is, when land becomes economically suitable, but there isnt enough people, u will get people from somewhere else. Countries in eastern europe have the same problem as Russia, so u wont get millions from eastern europe. So it becomes obvious that the migration will take place from central/ south/ south-east asia into russia.

Note. that this is without any wars/ major pandemic setback, nuclear armagadon or whatever.

I disagree with the term climate change. I do believe our Earth changes periodically, either on its own or by cosmic/universal/galactic events, the part of humanity in this is quite liittle. So I hardly believe this is only caused by humans. And the official standpoint of science is exactly this. If it was caused mainly by cars and ww1 bio warfare in the atmosphere, we would have been able to stop it or slow it down by now. Unfortunately that's not the case.

Whatever, Russia will cease to exist then. Imagine half billion asians and africans not demanding indepdence in Siberia. You're right in that aspect.

Napisano przez Daisy91old, 27.06.2021 at 17:18

Napisano przez ITSGG1122, 27.06.2021 at 16:58

Yeah, i spelled it wrong. It is caucasoid, thank you for pointing it out and writing a whole damn essay about it.
Ok now about climate change.
The consensus is : earth will warm up, lets just both agree on this, doesnt matter if u urself disagree.
If the earth warms up, regions will change, such us unhabitable land like siberia will now be habitable. Its lands become arable.
Due to climate change, other regions will hugely suffer. Most of these regions are now populated by immense amount of people. These people will migrate, it always happens.
Secondly, rich people tend to get fewer children than poor people. This is due to a lot of factors, but mainly education, benefits, health, women who go study and make career wont have time to bear a child etc. Russian population already is shrinking, it already has 11 million migrants, not all ofcourse from asia. The point here however is, when land becomes economically suitable, but there isnt enough people, u will get people from somewhere else. Countries in eastern europe have the same problem as Russia, so u wont get millions from eastern europe. So it becomes obvious that the migration will take place from central/ south/ south-east asia into russia.

Note. that this is without any wars/ major pandemic setback, nuclear armagadon or whatever.

I disagree with the term climate change. I do believe our Earth changes periodically, either on its own or by cosmic/universal/galactic events, the part of humanity in this is quite liittle. So I hardly believe this is only caused by humans. And the official standpoint of science is exactly this. If it was caused mainly by cars and ww1 bio warfare in the atmosphere, we would have been able to stop it or slow it down by now. Unfortunately that's not the case.

Whatever, Russia will cease to exist then. Imagine half billion asians and africans not demanding indepdence in Siberia. You're right in that aspect.

im not saying it is due to humanity or not. (altho, my opinion on this is that its caused by humans). Fact, is that the earth is warming up faster than it normally does. You cant deny this... Even if u go by 100.000 years period, you can see that since the industrial age till now its speeding up a lottt faster than any other periodical changes.

A 5 degree drop means that almost all north america is under ice. Which it was 20.000 years ago. Now imagine what a 5 degree increase will do. Like i said, all these 3 aforementioned regions will be arable. Doesnt matter if it is human caused or not, if the trend continues, then thats whats gonna happen.