For those who says that general isn't so much of an advantage...

both PD.

You probably heard we ain't in the prisoner-takin' business.

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 05.03.2016 at 15:51

You probably heard we ain't in the prisoner-takin' business.

You always have an image for everything, don't you?

Don..: fair rolls

...

Napisano przez clovis1122, 07.03.2016 at 21:17

...

Napisano przez Sificvoid, 30.11.2011 at 11:14

3) Do not bump posts to the top without adding constructive content to the thread.

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 07.03.2016 at 21:20

Napisano przez Sificvoid, 30.11.2011 at 11:14

3) Do not bump posts to the top without adding constructive content to the thread.

Does that rule also apply to off-topic?

Napisano przez RaulPB, 08.03.2016 at 04:40

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 07.03.2016 at 21:20

Napisano przez Sificvoid, 30.11.2011 at 11:14

3) Do not bump posts to the top without adding constructive content to the thread.

Does that rule also apply to off-topic?

It applies to any forum thread and specially those involving "clovis" and "generals".

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 08.03.2016 at 05:53

It applies to any forum thread and specially those involving "clovis" and "generals".

Nice anti-clovis measures. No hesitation from your side.

sorry clovis, you cant fight against CD

If both where pd that battle was waaaay to close. I would never attack pd infantry with any type of infantry if you don't atleast had 30% more troops.

It's not op. Don't be a cheap ass and buy premium.

Case Solved.

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 08.03.2016 at 05:53

Napisano przez RaulPB, 08.03.2016 at 04:40

Napisano przez Columna Durruti, 07.03.2016 at 21:20

Napisano przez Sificvoid, 30.11.2011 at 11:14

3) Do not bump posts to the top without adding constructive content to the thread.

Does that rule also apply to off-topic?

It applies to any forum thread and specially those involving "clovis" and "generals".

Columna obliteratin'